honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Give some comprehensive reasons why you think Gilchrist wasn't great at ODIs. Considering he's been selected in many AT ODI XIs in many different spheres.
If your reasoning is "he only averaged 35", then don't bother.
Well, it makes more sense than your only reason for his apparent ODI greatness being "hundred in WC finals".. And him being selected in an AT ODI XI is just the same as MSD being selected in an AT T20I XI. If you want me to pull out a statistical analysis for why he is not great, you gotta wait till I finish my work day. But subjectively, I watched almost all of his ODIs and he was not the best keeper nor the best opener and therefore not an ATG in this format. Maybe my post should read AT greatness instead of just greatness but that is where I stand. He is an ATG in tests but not in ODIs. Many people just assume he was an ATG in that format based on test success, just like that poster did with MSD and T20.
Last edited: