I dunno, i reckon Dobell has a smidgen of a point.
Anecdote. I have put sky sport sepcifically back on for the test cricket. I entirely missed any of Sunday's play due to kids commitments. I didn't even want to watch the sky sports 1 hour highlights package to catch up on what I missed.
When they switch to Spark, I take it they aren't intending on using test cricket to drive subscriptions? Which smells of potential personal doom for me.
If it doesn't bounce, spin or seam, and the ball doesn't swing. What is the modus operandi? Waiting for batting ineptitude? and top-edges (maybe also classed as batting ineptitude) Which England gave us plenty of in Tauranga. It's pretty boring to watch your own team bowl in NZ at the moment, unless Wagner suddenly gets his groove on.
The Mount actually ended up being OK, because it turned into a last day minefield and we were winning (albeit a minefield surprisingly unthreatening, but it kept it interesting that anything might happen).
Of the recent pitches, I think I prefer the seamy road. Advance the game quickly in first 2 days, then let a batting duel evolve. At least there's hope of a result, rather than assuming a draw and left with hope of the less than 50% chance of an NZ pitch deteriorating.Although, tbf, we've got a fair few results the last few years - at some point the sub-contintental visitors always go into a Wagner short ball melt down on the flattest of pitches.
So far, we're average 5 to 6 wickets per day over 9 days of test cricket (51 wickets in 9 days). Partly down to England's old ball passivity.