• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why aren't there more spinner all rounders?

Jack1

International Debutant
Wagner is a rare breed, he relies on variety and guile in test matches but doesn't play international limited overs. About the spin all-rounders Jadeja and Shakib are atg test players assuming they both get in an asia xi atg team
 

h_hurricane

International Vice-Captain
What are the odds that Jadeja would go on to become the best spin bowling all rounder in history ? Pretty good imo (if you ignore Faulkner who played a century back and had a short career).

Shakib is the only other contender. It would be interesting how he comes back after the ban.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Sobers. Hammond. Benaud. Even from his own country Ashwin and Tendulkar will have cases. Sobers is actually rather good as a spinner. Ofc these all lean one way or another in dominance but Sobers and Hammond cannot be overlooked.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
Sobers was ok but his average is better than it should be he bowled in a super stacked team with heaps of pressure at the other end on the batsmen , he might have averaged 5 more in a normal side so I take his bowling with a massive pinch or salt when his average was 34 I really
dont think he was that good at bowling to be blunt despite being an atg batsman. I mean obviously he’s an atg batsman but he wouldn’t bowl at all in any team we picked him in, whereas Jadeja definitely would dominate in favourable conditions so would be more valuable than sobers in my view , aware thead was about active play(a)ers just an fyi milen

Suppose also jadeja trumps sobers in the field , although both gun fielders Jadeja is probably better to have in the field
 
Last edited:

ataraxia

International Coach
This was at a time when Valentine averaged 30 in Tests. Sobers' FC average was less than 2 digits higher than Valentine's. From his stats I think he was used as more of an all-rounder at the FC level and focused on batsmanship in Tests. Used as an all-rounder he is stretches ahead of Jadeja. His bowling average is also affected by him
bowling 54 overs in a big innings with the series already won, probably on a road (1966 in England).
 

Jack1

International Debutant
Depends on conditions , I wouldn’t pick sobers over Jadeja on a spin friendly surface
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Depends on conditions , I wouldn’t pick sobers over Jadeja on a spin friendly surface
So, a World XI of?

Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Tendulkar
Richards
Gilchrist +
Jadeja
Pacer
Warne
Pacer
Pacer/Mura

I find this a wee bit difficult to stomach.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
So, a World XI of?

Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Tendulkar
Richards
Gilchrist +
Jadeja
Pacer
Warne
Pacer
Pacer/Mura

I find this a wee bit difficult to stomach.
I am not picking Murali or Warne over Jadeja on a turning wicket

I was more comparing sobers and jadeja I wouldn’t pick either in an atg team, but they are both atg players

I’d playing something like this conditions dependant

1. Bradman (c)
2. Sutcliffe
3. Barrington
4. Steven Smith
5. AB De Villiers
6. Chanderpaul
7. Gilchrist
8. Billy Bates
9. Billy Barnes
10. SF Barnes
11. Lohmann

Bowling is very debatable considering variables by eras and I’d like to see everyone in person to make valid picks. Lohmann is a dead lock in an atg team with his stats regardless, it’s unfair to discount early era players the game wouldn’t exist unless someone played at the start but it’s just my opinion.
To be honest if you have 15 games minimum as the cut off this bowling attack is a lock in stats wise whether I like it or not. Considering the variety of sf Barnes it’s going to be hard to look past them and I think they would be the hardest to bat against for my top 7.

Btw there’s a reason for the batting , the top 6 are the best in test history in those slots apart from Bradman who can bat anywhere anyway, I take all atg discussion with a pinch of salt
We are all guessing bar stats
 
Last edited:

Jack1

International Debutant
By those measures put in Headley, Voges, and G Pollock. That is frankly ridiculous.
Tell me what’s ridiculous and why

I’ll wait for your answer

There has to be a cut off for minimum inns , what that is is a personal choice , get over it lol it’s not a serious discussion anyway

and btw tell me who you are replacing and in what positions with those players I’ll wait haha
 
Last edited:

ataraxia

International Coach
At that time you could make a Test side off a FC batting average of 22. Such is the lack in quality of those pitches. Also, at that time FC stats better reflect a career.
 
Last edited:

ataraxia

International Coach
Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Sobers - 5
Grace* - 6
Hammond - 7
Gilchrist +
Hadlee - 2
Marshall - 3
Warne - 4
McGrath - 1

Bad side to most people here but legions ahead of yours in the eyes of most.

(Hammond ahead of Tendulkar is very debatable)
 
Last edited:

Jack1

International Debutant
At that time you could make a Test side off a FC batting average of 22. Such is the lack in quality of those pitches. At that time FC stats also better reflect a career.
So what? Lohmann’s average has to basically double to get knocked out. I know what you are saying but I don’t actually care that much there are a ton of psychological , era and cultural (and other else) variables that go with the averages . There are at least 20 bowlers that anyone can argue for an atg team era dependant I am well aware
 

Jack1

International Debutant
Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Sobers - 5
Grace* - 6
Hammond - 7
Gilchrist +
Hadlee - 2
Marshall - 3
Warne - 4
McGrath - 1

Bad side to most people here but legions ahead of yours in the eyes of most.

Difference between me and you is I don’t care about style, nationality or anything else nor am I serious, keep arguing with yourself lol nothing can be proven for atg teams and most of it is an opinion

The fact is your batting line up is very very weak compared to mine, painfully so actually but GL with it, let’s move on who cares haha
 
Last edited:

ataraxia

International Coach
So what? Lohmann’s average has to basically double to get knocked out. I know what you are saying but I don’t actually care that much there are a ton of psychological , era and cultural (and other else) variables that go with the averages . There are at least 20 bowlers that anyone can argue for an atg team era dependant I am well aware
Putting Lohmann and SF Barnes in is okay but putting Chanders, ABDV, Billy Barnes, Bates, and Barrington is not. ABDV does have a case as keeper though.
 

Top