You really have too much ego invested in players like akhtar Lee and in other circumstances murali. It’s degrades your contributions, usually poor anyway, into utter fatuity.According to "opinionators"
1. Bradman would average 255134671 if he played today
2. Frank Tyson bowled at 110mph
3. Larwood bowled at 105mph
4. Thompson bowled at 120mph
5. Cricket has regressed for 70 years, while all other sports including baseball has progressed.
Pretty often for a fair chunk of his career tbh. His problem was he sprayed it all over the place most of the time.It's impossible for any bowler to consistently bowl in 150s let alone 160s. That famous Shaun Tait over where he bowled in 150s for example; how often was he able to replicate that? Conversely, Archer really cranked it up in the first game with well over 90 miles deliveries but then he wasn't able to come close in rest of the games.
An express pacer bowls around 145 km with occasional 148-150km deliveries. 160 km is something like once in a lifetime thing. And if any bowler in the history of the game was able to bowl 170 km, we would have seen at least few others who would have come close to that. It's not like we have had a dearth of express bowlers all these years.
I loved the way the broader Indian fan base just lapped up that he was the fastest bowler in the world, despite no one ever having actually seen him bowl.Atul Sharma hurled it down at 175kph I'm pretty sure.
This photo is of a 200km/h delivery, confirmed by Bradman himself.
This is such a great photo.
Could you please explain this comment, I don't understand the joke?Look at how thin that stick is. That's gonna vibrate more than your mum's top drawer.
There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.Atul Sharma hurled it down at 175kph I'm pretty sure.
you really do take everything seriously don't youThere have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.
Australia is slowly becoming like the India of old. You guys put a vegetarian medium pacer on the park for 3 of the most important tests of the calendar and your most popular player is a balding skinny fat spinner.There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.
Another opinionHasn't regressed in letting blokes bend their arm while "bowling" though.
Is that the third opinion you presented?You really have too much ego invested in players like akhtar Lee and in other circumstances murali. It’s degrades your contributions, usually poor anyway, into utter fatuity.
You seems to be bloody serious . . .There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.