GoodAreasShane
Cricketer Of The Year
SOK was never a great 50 over bowler, but at least he is economical. Seems odd
Anyone know why Nair is being allowed to bowl ?You'd think if you're blatantly chucking it as bad as Nair does you'd at least be accurate ffs.
He always seemed pretty decent to me. If you mean his average, then yes, he hasn't taken the wickets and has a ridiculously high List A average but I wouldn't necessarily say that means he's not a good bowler in the format.SOK was never a great 50 over bowler, but at least he is economical. Seems odd
I absolutely think having an average that high over a large sample size is plenty enough to say he isn't a good bowler in the format.He always seemed pretty decent to me. If you mean his average, then yes, he hasn't taken the wickets and has a ridiculously high List A average but I wouldn't necessarily say that means he's not a good bowler in the format.
If his economy rate was actually awesome rather than just decent I could see the argument for it, but it's actually higher than Lyon's in domestic cricket. If your strike rate is going to be 72 you really need to be a genius miser to be considered good, and he's not.I absolutely think having an average that high over a large sample size is plenty enough to say he isn't a good bowler in the format.