wpdavid
Hall of Fame Member
Yes, that's my point.2 4th seamers don't make up for a third seamer.
Yes, that's my point.2 4th seamers don't make up for a third seamer.
Good research there. And good timing, as Smith reaches 41. I'd be astonished if anyone outdid this.Answering my own question but Lara had 6 digs in his 688 SL series. His lowest was 40
I remember being surprised to find that Bradman did have a lot more failures then people think.No idea, but Bradmans 974 record breaking series had scores of 8, 1 and 14 in his 7 innings, so Smith is way ahead of that
This has been outdone many times. A number of batsmen have made half centuries in every innings of a series in which they batted at least five times.Good research there. And good timing, as Smith reaches 41. I'd be astonished if anyone outdid this.
OK. Not doubting you, but it would be interesting to see who they were.This has been outdone many times. A number of batsmen have made half centuries in every innings of a series in which they batted at least five times.
Walters did six in six against West Indies in 1968/69. Walters lowest score was 50.OK. Not doubting you, but it would be interesting to see who they were.
Weeks vs India 1948/49. Lowest score of 48 (779 runs in 7 innings)Good research there. And good timing, as Smith reaches 41. I'd be astonished if anyone outdid this.
Seems like a crazy amount of 50-50 calls have gone against us this seriesI really hate how easy the umpires appear to be to influence with big appeals.
Yeah the Warner decision those innings in particular was woeful.Seems like a crazy amount of 50-50 calls have gone against us this series
Least Smith is still out there