I don't see controversy with this. From what I've seen it's a widely accepted fact, even on here, that England didn't win the World Cup. You probably just rubbed a few head-in-the-sand English supporters the wrong way by reminding them of an unpalatable truth.Appreciate your support Burgey. Im sure ill be banned shortly but I always appreciated your posts.
Apparently, claiming a fact that England were awarded a WC and did not win it is considered Nationalist on here. I refuse to be a part of such nonsense. Rather stand out than follow the blind.
Enjoy the Ashes win mate! Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi
Well I got an infraction for that. Again, lazy moderation because eh who has the time to read through all posts. GIMH and Hanza or whatever his name is were in denial. I refused to cave in, so in order to just hush the situation down some lazy infraction was handed out and I was called a nationalist. Its like a vicious cycle.I don't see controversy with this. From what I've seen it's a widely accepted fact, even on here, that England didn't win the World Cup. You probably just rubbed a few head-in-the-sand English supporters the wrong way by reminding them of an unpalatable truth.
What's his average score after crossing 50? And Bradman's?Yeah, once past 190 Smith only averages 211. Bradman he's not (yet).
(192, 199, 211, 215, 239)
I'd like to think so but this forum has some dedicated contributorsArrogance has a way of biting people in the ass. I may not be your cup of tea but im upfront and honest. People can survive without the forum, the forum cant survive without people. Make sure you use better examples the next time. And I'm sure that ambitious guy is doing much better than you while you post on a cricket forum.
If he moved up to no. 3, had a bit of a stronger batting line-up around him, and was a lot more selfish he'd probably make a triple hundred every yearSmith doesn't even have a triple hundred yet are we sure he's any good? Even Karun Nair has one. Against this very team in fact.
I mean you answered your own question there. I wouldn't say he looked unduly troubled by Jadeja given the conditions and quality of the bowling, but "given" is doing a lot of work there.How did he go against Jadeja in individual confrontations in India? I can see he got out to him a couple of times, but only after making a ton of runs.
Yeah, I only ask because that's about the only soft spot I can sense in his game. But conquering Jadeja in India is a giant feat too. That series is two years old now though; wonder if it's an uncertainty, if you can call it that, that's crept into his batting sinceI mean you answered your own question there. I wouldn't say he looked unduly troubled by Jadeja given the conditions and quality of the bowling, but "given" is doing a lot of work there.
He is the Mark Waugh of 200sYeah, once past 190 Smith only averages 211. Bradman he's not (yet).
(192, 199, 211, 215, 239)