That collapse we had was so important. The middle order has very rarely had that sort of platform in recent times as well. There is that dream of Buttler and Stokes destroying an opposition, maybe it will happen one day.This is what we should have done to Australia in our first innings. Just have an inability to put the foot down when we're on top.
They probably should have declared by now, but it's still pretty dispiriting.
I know this, but England's ODI team doesn't get 90 overs to score 300. A balance of play styles could achieve great things. It's not impossibleEngland’s ODI team don’t play on day 5 pitches. 300 is ungettable.
The turn is slow enough / with potential rain to block out the day though.
The BULLSHIZzLE 65 over ball change to one hooping.That collapse we had was so important. The middle order has very rarely had that sort of platform in recent times as well. There is that dream of Buttler and Stokes destroying an opposition, maybe it will happen one day.
Yep, can't forget about the WI Shai Hope double matchHe won't take any chances. There's always the risk that things don't go as planned, opposition finds itself at 220/2 at tea and then there's the fear that they may go into ODI mode.
Might not need them way we bat.The problem with this non declaration is Australia wont get many overs with the 2nd new ball to knock over Englands middle order, they really would have wanted at least 25 overs with it guaranteed.
How often has that happenedBurns has the potential to bat on all 5 days of a test match if Aus declare tonight
Definitely. But Steve Smith would have to ball on all five daysBurns has the potential to bat on all 5 days of a test match if Aus declare tonight
Boycott, Lamb and Flintoff (lol) have apparently previously done that for EnglandHow often has that happened