• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

1st Test, Edgbaston, Birmingham

Spintolose

U19 Cricketer
What's with all the blokes liking blokes in this thread. Is this a millenials thing?
As I said in my now deleted Tinder profile (before Warne stole every single woman within a 1000km radius).

"I am a man. I bring the ugliness and strength. You bring the prettiness (and hopefully good ironing skills)"
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No way should Marnus bat ahead of Smith, but yeah. Harris is definitely a better option than Bancroft.

In any case with Harris it feels like we're talking him down based on one bad Test...which could happen to anyone. Apart from that he did fine.
I was heavily backing Bancroft for the spot but after seeing that innings I think I was wrong. Harris would probably be better
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
On the subject of hardly anyone being able to bat in England recently, who was the last international batsman who was really, really good at the leave? Anyone since peak Cook+Trott?
Pakistan did OK in 2016 but they got some fairly dry pitches that year IIRC. India sucked balls last year and SA before that weren't much better.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Excellent, England are already -2 points in the Test championship (4 mins deducted for the 2 wkts)
Just realised this could get farcical.

I reckon they should give longer for each wicket. Aside from the somewhat variable time for the batsman to get to the wicket - which is a maximum of three minutes to timed out - batsmen seem to spend much longer marking their crease than they used to. Either that or they get the third or fourth umpire to actually time it.
 
Last edited:

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
NZ are the only decent looking side purely because of kw and southee.

India are especially bad. Kohli is popular with the ladies but he oozes douche from every pore, Pujara is cute^TM but has nightmarish acne issues, Ishant was the ugliest cricketer in the world even before he got his man bun, bhuvi looks stoned, Ashwin is basically a middle aged software engineer who's had too many of Amma's idlis, Kuldeep's ugliness has been covered well in previous posts by Shri, and the rest of them have those hideous wannabe kohli beards. 2/10 at best
All NZ quicks are pretty good looking as a general rule. Shane Bond :wub:
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Wait, is Strauss commentating? Doesn't he have, like, another job? That made him give up commentating in the first place?
 

Top