If the '99 semi was this certainly oughta beI believe the game will be recorded as a tie in ICC records.
Looking forward to joining you ****s for the Ashes; I ordered a new mic and all.best game of cricket
i'm so happy we did CW Comms for this
I mean we would be fine winning the football World Cup on penalties right?lol imagine trying to call a world cup final a ****ing tie. weak.
everyone knows the rules going into the final.
Everyone's a winnerCould have called it as a tie and a shared trophy - I don't think there'd have been too many complaints
Or standing in the league round which would have meant England still wins. I dunno honestly.Boundaries rule is stupid. NZ lost fewer wickets. That should have counted.
exactly what was in my mind. ****ing bizarre response from some. the most bizarre being 'it should have gone to the team who lost fewer wickets'.I mean we would be fine winning the football World Cup on penalties right?
Yeah the game was a tie but the World Cup winner was England. The World Cup winner and the winner of the World Cup final are two very very subtly different things.Let me reiterate that this was a tie. Official records can get ****ed.
Should just replay the thing imoOr standing in the league round which would have meant England still wins. I dunno honestly.
League positions would be the most logical tiebreaker if the Super Over couldn't split it (it's how Australia went through in 1999), yeah.Or standing in the league round which would have meant England still wins. I dunno honestly.