Flem274*
123/5
you're better at the non-contact sport unless in your instance it involves things you'f rather not dredge up again mate. you're only hurting yourself with this statement.New Zealand are just the beta male version of Australia.
you're better at the non-contact sport unless in your instance it involves things you'f rather not dredge up again mate. you're only hurting yourself with this statement.New Zealand are just the beta male version of Australia.
In real cricketSmith averages 41, not 60.
What on earth?! In a thread about the ODI going on today you used Smith's innings today to claim Smith's superiority. Now you're changing formats!In real cricket
Kane is a top player but Smith >>>>>>>>>> any batsman of his generation
It's completely useless. Still had India ahead when they were 25-3.Win predictor having England 93% is it a bit harsh is it not
Is Rugby even a contact sport anymore? Last time I glanced at it felt like each match was 5 penalty goals vs 3. Might have more intricacy/technical skill than rugby league but it sure is ****ing dull to watchyou're better at the non-contact sport unless in your instance it involves things you'f rather not dredge up again mate. you're only hurting yourself with this statement.
Williamson: instills the team with determination and grit, blossoming into an excellent captainDude please
60 average doesn’t lie