• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

1st Semi Final - India v New Zealand

Who will win the match?


  • Total voters
    26

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
When I was a kid, I thought that a panel of experts should be asked for the revised target in case of rain delays. And then average it out. Wish this was a world where that kind of a thing could be made to work.
I nominate Duckworth, Lewis and Stern as the 3 experts.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I basically agree with you with the additional caveat that it’s far easier to take a long run sample size POV perspective on DLS in a non-KO scenario. In a situation like this with disproportionate rewards for victory, the long run logic isn’t as tight imo prima facie and ‘rerun or start where you left off tomorrow’ might even be better over a a 47 overs to 20 overs DLS. Haven’t really looked into it much though.
Yeah the problem with this is that if it rains all day tomorrow and some team qualifies just by virtue or finishing higher, then the ICC looks absolutely stupid for setting that rule and wasting the opportunity to have a shortened game with a result. Much more stupid than using an imperfect but still awesome DLS system (unless India lose of course :) ).
 
Last edited:

cnerd123

likes this
When I was a kid, I thought that a panel of experts should be asked for the revised target in case of rain delays. And then average it out. Wish this was a world where that kind of a thing could be made to work.

I mean, what's a reasonable estimate in a situation like this. 30 overs - target should be ~160, right?
150 in 30 overs IMO. India were getting set for ~235 in 50 overs.
 

ajdude

International Coach
When I was a kid, I thought that a panel of experts should be asked for the revised target in case of rain delays. And then average it out. Wish this was a world where that kind of a thing could be made to work.

I mean, what's a reasonable estimate in a situation like this. 30 overs - target should be ~160, right?
oh god imagine if the expert panel was like shane warne, michael vaughan and pommie mbangwa though
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
oh god imagine if the expert panel was like shane warne, michael vaughan and pommie mbangwa though
Eggzactly.

Edit: Honestly, though, think even they would do a decent job when given that kind of a responsibility. Maybe it could be the umpires and the match referee.
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
wouldn't call 50-50 match because India have some batsmen who are better in T20 and ODI (Pant, Hardik, DK)
Yeah India's questionable batting selections suddenly become awesome ones in this situation. I wonder if Kohli actually looked at the forecast before selecting the team -- he overthinks everything so it wouldn't surprise me at all.
 

srbhkshk

International Captain
150 in 30 overs IMO. India were getting set for ~235 in 50 overs.
Nah, exaggeration. 120 in 20 overs is considered almost sure shot victory - and I don't see how 150 in 30 overs is any more difficult. 240 in 50 overs is also easy - but it's certainly tougher than 120 in 20.
 

Arachnodouche

International Captain
Never would've guessed Vaughan would turn out to be such a prick and a troll after retirement. He always seemed so calm and measured then. A bit like Siddhu in that regard. I didn't know how Siddhu sounded until he stank up the commentary panel.
 

Top