Victor Ian
International Coach
If you're like me, you'll find that is actually a very helpful 'feature'. Just wish I'd edit more posts.
Huh i missed this. OkIs this type of racist filth allowed on these forums? There is nothing funny about it.
It might just be funny to a racist nation like Australia but not to other people.
Presumably this dickhead copped a warning for this ****.Is this type of racist filth allowed on these forums? There is nothing funny about it.
It might just be funny to a racist nation like Australia but not to other people.
Correct. To edit your post, go back to the forum, switch to desktop mode (this will return you to the thread) and edit it that way.^Is the Edit function not quite right on cell phones? The screen opens and just as I'm editing it reloads and deletes my original comment.
Could be worth a try. I wouldn't give Kane the new ball though. Behrendorff maybe because he can really use it well but then you'd have 2 lefties opening. We are really missing Hazelwood.Just an idea- would it make sense to give either Richardson or Coota or any of the 3rd seamer the new ball and hold Cummins for first change. The way I see it most teams when playing Estraya just opt to see off Cumstarc and attack the 3rd guy and none of the third guys in the squad seem like they are capable of handling it.
Give them the new pill and it would increase their chances of taking wickets and bowl a chunk of their overseas when the batsmen are circumspect. Cummins would still be good as first change. Jhye is a big blow tbh
Probably worth a go. Especially as Cummins is capable of adjusting roles imo. Would probably go with Dorff to partner Starc if this were to happen.Just an idea- would it make sense to give either Richardson or Coota or any of the 3rd seamer the new ball and hold Cummins for first change. The way I see it most teams when playing Estraya just opt to see off Cumstarc and attack the 3rd guy and none of the third guys in the squad seem like they are capable of handling it.
Give them the new pill and it would increase their chances of taking wickets and bowl a chunk of their overseas when the batsmen are circumspect. Cummins would still be good as first change. Jhye is a big blow tbh
Yes while putting your best foot forward early is important, it's also good to keep as much of your best overs in reserve as you can. It's why I was never too worried this game even when SL were 2/180-ish and in a strong position on paper, because Finch kept his best overs to the end (Starc and Cummins had only bowled 5 each around the 35 over mark IIRC), though Maxwell being treated too well allowed that to happen.Maybe but we have little comeback if the opposition successfully sees off or clobbers our opening pair. We might get good overs from Dorff at the top and then batsmen have the added worry of Cummins next.
Australia tried this a couple of World Cups ago with McGrath. Did not go well and he was nearly as good a bowler as Cummins.Probably worth a go. Especially as Cummins is capable of adjusting roles imo. Would probably go with Dorff to partner Starc if this were to happen.
Umm, they won the WC in 2007 with McGrath doing this and iirc he was leading wicket taker & player of the tourney.Australia tried this a couple of World Cups ago with McGrath. Did not go well and he was nearly as good a bowler as Cummins.