Bahseph
International Debutant
It literally depends on our bowling being brilliant throughout.Unless QDK and Rabada have a blinder in the WC we have no chance of winning. Not enough genuine class through the batting to get us through a WC.
It literally depends on our bowling being brilliant throughout.Unless QDK and Rabada have a blinder in the WC we have no chance of winning. Not enough genuine class through the batting to get us through a WC.
Which isnt a given. Theres also a dearth of all rounders. All rounders win world cups or get you at least close especially in ODI- Brian mcmillan, Hansie, Pollock , Klusnener, Kallis, Boje, come to mind.It literally depends on our bowling being brilliant throughout.
But is there a greater potential for a loss if we stick with the same guys who aren't performing? That's what needs to be weighed up, and while I'm against knee-jerk reactions of calling for players to go, it's definitely gone beyond knee-jerk for some players.The thing is will you guys except that there would be more potential loses if we do wholesale changes
But is there a greater potential for a loss if we stick with the same guys who aren't performing? That's what needs to be weighed up, and while I'm against knee-jerk reactions of calling for players to go, it's definitely gone beyond knee-jerk for some players.
Great point. I'd be able to accept a loss if I knew the team had potential to be together as a unit and learn for an extended amount of time. It is a delicate balancing act, which is why I wouldn't just kick Elgar and Faf to the curb.The thing is will you guys accept that there would be more potential loses if we do wholesale changes
I would quite happily accept loses if I felt we were going in the right direction.... problem I have is that we have discussed the batting problems for 2 years now and nothing has really changed. I do understand that they have tried to maintain a certain stability and also gave other deserving players a chance (de Bruyn and now Hamza) when they could, but it has not solved the underlying issues.The thing is will you guys accept that there would be more potential loses if we do wholesale changes
Which makes me think it was a personal decision to not play 4-day cricket ?He played one match and had returns of 7-123.
Durban used to be a massive stronghold for us. The team was mainly coastal too.An interesting conversation on Radio 2000, about the regions of which the team originates. Even when we were at our peak as a Test team we had trouble in Durban especially. And that's also because it is sort of an away game for most of the team. With most of them being from the Highveld. Now I'm not using that as an excuse, or a reason for this display, it just got me thinking.
Now back to this game. Surely heads have to roll. StephenZA made a good point in the tour thread about the lack of replacements making a splash domestically. And that is true. But maybe, just maybe, it's time to bite the bullet and take a punt on people we see have potential.
Not interested in seeing Temba in whites again. Or Amla. Both for differing reasons.
Which then raises the question - is anyone else likely to go Kolpak?The Brexit deadline in the end of March means that Kolpak would likely not be an available option after that...therefore it's now or never for a lot of these players.
My bets Morris and Frylink.Which then raises the question - is anyone else likely to go Kolpak?
Which then raises the question - is anyone else likely to go Kolpak?
Would Frylinck qualify ? That is the thing. I think there are certain cap qualifications.My bets Morris and Frylink.
The thing is, as a fan you want to know there is quality in depthI felt he was always going to go Kolpak... his international experience just gave him more exposure, never felt like he would have a long SA career, would not be a top 3 seamer in a SA attack unless injuries or very poor form. Once Philander, Steyn retire, Nortje Ngidi and one or two others seem better long term options. And obviously he needed to make the decision now with Brexit uncertainty.
According to Wikipedia, it's either a specified number of caps (which they don't specify...) or a valid work permit. Olivier possibly gets in on the work permit due to his previous county stint as he's only played 12 times for South Africa which might not be enough.Would Frylinck qualify ? That is the thing. I think there are certain cap qualifications.