Could be, injury / form cover for De Gradhomme or Neesham. Probably a better fit into the playing XI than Bracwell.Could Mitchell be a bolter?
Could be, injury / form cover for De Gradhomme or Neesham. Probably a better fit into the playing XI than Bracwell.Could Mitchell be a bolter?
My guess is that it's because he's a more conservative type of spinner, which kane likes.Astle is looking no better than Sodhi here and if we’re deciding based on their batting at no.9 then we’re in trouble.
this is about the best he can bowl and it's against the mighty bangladesh at 90/5, i wouldn't go gloating just yet when his partner in 10 overs sprayed it all overWow Phlegm is right, Neeshams overs look game losonh
taking the wicket of a #8 against bangladesh 6/190 isn't the standard by which i judge my 5th bowler sorry. i realise wellington fans have lower expectations from their players and you're infatuated with #8s but they're not really that important. bangladesh bat deep here and they still suck because real bowlers dealt with their top 6.And took wickets. Our genuine bowlers also had varying degrees of success. Youre insane if you dont see the value of 10 half decent bowlers that could bat 6-7 instead of a slightly better bowler that bats 9. Stacking the bowling with Tastles and Sodhis isnt ever going to work
im a pretty big lord colin fan but that was about the only ball he put in the channel all dayCDG took their #3, what you talking bout willis
Rain delay in the first innings, I think.Why the short interval?