Speaking of, I'd like to introduce you to South African Evangelical Christian Same-*** Married Leg Spinning All Rounder-ing, South Africa Captaining Saudi Arabian Shill, Dane van Niekerk.so that's a daughter of an Indian immigrant playing for the UAE full national team?
Brand new world, etc.
good spin, i'll give them thatSpeaking of, I'd like to introduce you to South African Evangelical Christian Same-*** Married Leg Spinning All Rounder-ing, South Africa Captaining Saudi Arabian Shill, Dane van Niekerk.
That threw me for a second.....Speaking of, I'd like to introduce you to South African Evangelical Christian Same-*** Married Leg Spinning All Rounder-ing, South Africa Captaining Saudi Arabian Shill, Dane van Niekerk.
There are at least 3 labels in that post that directly and wholly contradict each other.Speaking of, I'd like to introduce you to South African Evangelical Christian Same-*** Married Leg Spinning All Rounder-ing, South Africa Captaining Saudi Arabian Shill, Dane van Niekerk.
Dane is a boy name, tbf. Maybe that's where they went wrong.There are at least 3 labels in that post that directly and wholly contradict each other.
ils sont fous, ces Africains...Dane is a boy name, tbf. Maybe that's where they went wrong.
100Just want to confirm this:
If a batsman comes in at #11, and is on strike. He faces his first ball, the umpire calls
no ball... He hits it to cow corner. The call is 'two'. Whilst he turns around to start the 2nd run, he notices the fielder already picked up the ball. His partner (let's call him #10) is already half-way down the pitch coming at him. #11 stands his ground at the non-striker's end. The throw comes in at the striker's end. The keeper whips off the bails. #10 is out.
What is #11's strike rate?
That's what I thought also. But I stumbled upon an old scorecard from 20 years ago that clearly showed a #11 batsmen left not out on 1*(0).100
because he's on 1 (1) right?
I think so actually.Did scoring changed from then to now?
That's what I thought also. But I stumbled upon an old scorecard from 20 years ago that clearly showed a #11 batsmen left not out on 1*(0).
Full Scorecard of Bangladesh vs Kenya, Meril International Cricket Tournament, 2nd Match - Score Report | ESPNcricinfo.com
Must have either changed or that was an error, because no-balls should count as balls-facedDid scoring changed from then to now?
I'll have to check it out in the literature someplaceI think so actually.
Probably the scorers at that game weren't too sure about that. Or maybe there was one scorer that day, because in the rules, it says that there should always be two scorers and they should always correspondMust have either changed or that was an error, because no-balls should count as balls-faced