Okay. But 90s Zim were way, way above those 2 other teams. These days they're crapI think it is a common practice to exclude BAN/KEN/ZIM while comparing players/team . I didn't do intentionally .
Agree with this . They even won test series against IND/PAK in 90s.Okay. But 90s Zim were way, way above those 2 other teams. These days they're crap
Boycott would fit in there somewhereA complete defensive player, I suppose. Like Barrington. Though these two had all the strokes in the book.
Stop agreeing. CW is not meant to be so nice.Agree with this . They even won test series against IND/PAK in 90s.
This. Torn apart with cold, hard facts. Turns out Sunilz is a quality poster who, unfortunately, Burgey managed to bait and drag down to his level in the past.What a great thread. Burgey owned and boned.
I don't understand half of what you post but I am always entertained.Gavaskar is a mythological figure in my village.
When India played that ODI at my home ground, Albion, I heard of how he took apart the Windies bowlers. He hit one a six that went into a hotel(where a bunch of shady activities were going on: prostitution, drugs, and chutney music) by the roadside. This was over the long on boundary. And he also hit a six that went over the midwicket boundary and out of the ground, across the road, over the canal, and into a coconut grove owned by a man we called 'Mustapha'. He was in the copra business, exported the stuff. Richest man in the area at that time.
It was Phagwah. It was colorful that day.
Obviously I wasn't around to witness that, but every middle aged individual to pensioner who was at the ground that day tells the same story.
Since then no one has ever hit a ball that far at the ground.
The hotel is still in operation. Mustapha sadly passed away. Copra went out of demand. He turned to rice...
At least you see it as glass half full.I don't understand half of what you post but I am always entertained.
Wasn't he kinda **** as an attacker though?Barrington wasn't a complete defensive player FTR. Had kind of a Jack Hobbs type career, very attacking batsmen as a young man, and turned into a stonewaller later on.
Thanks - huge difference in number of matches played of course and maybe it's closer if you only include a smaller stretch of Aus/WI matches (i.e. their best streaks) - but this India team doesn't just win home series, they nearly whitewash all their opponents. Very low draw rate, just the 1 loss (vs Aus?) and tons of wins.Comparing Indian team home performance against AUS/WI is like comparing Ashwin to Warne/ Murali tbh . But here is the stats
IND(since ENG tour 2012)
Team records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
WI(1980-94)
Team records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
AUS(1995-07)
Team records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
Yep - that was a great example of statistics sometimes being really silly.There's a million meaningless stats you can use to back your POV. Who was the lobotomized poster a few weeks back who said the three Indian quicks took more wickets in a year as a trio than any other in history, which at face value sounded good, until it was pointed out that two bowlers alone took more wickets than they did in 1981?
Can someone tell me what chutney music is, cos it’s been mentioned with drug taking and prostitution, so it sounds like it has a fair amount of potential.