If it was a poor sportsman, humourless jerk-off, bogus charity fronting, hunter of defenceless animals XI McGrath would be a shoe-in.
Ahh. I should have read back for what the criteria was.
I'm on record as disliking the pink test as tokenism, but really not sure you can call actual on the ground breast cancer care nurse provision "bogus"...
Agreed. I've heard rumours though that very little of the money raised by the pink ball Test actually gets put into breast cancer treatment. Of course, these are just rumours.
Does anyone actually claim that a large proportion of the money raised goes to the breast care nurses?
I'm stuck in the fifties lol.
They do what works. They're a business that relies on donations. Their directors could probably earn three times as much in the corporate sector. The harsh reality is that it's hard work running a successful charity and management/ administration costs aren't free and aren't even a predictor of the quality of the charity.
Who is Bev?
That strange hyperactive Hurricanes fanboy from Facebook
Yeah from my understanding the McGrath Foundation is nothing like the Warne Foundation. Obviously the McGrath Foundation could be full of **** too but it does seem to do genuinely good work.
Just googled it and I think you're right mate.
