OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Larwood's record really isn't "poor" though is it. He probably has the best test record for any pacer from that era.
Not really, Bowes at least has a much better average and Voce's is better too, but Larwood didn't get to play the weaker teams like WI or NZ as much and was unfit while playing for good chunks of '28-'29 and '30. Bowes only played two tests away. As a matter of fact I find judging pace bowlers from then really hard as none of their records are really rounded.Larwood's record really isn't "poor" though is it. He probably has the best test record for any pacer from that era.
Tate?Larwood's record really isn't "poor" though is it. He probably has the best test record for any pacer from that era.
Sutcliffe played more matches in the 30’s then both Hutton and Ponsford. If you’re going by matches played you’d take Hutton out of the three.Sutcliffe only played for half of the decade and his best years were in the previous decade so I'll take Ponsford in a 30s XI. Like Compton doesn't make a 30s XI either.
Ponsford
Hutton
Bradman
Hammond
Headley
Nourse/McCabe
Ames
Voce
Larwood
Grimmett
O'Reilly
Ponsford would probably have retired anyway - don't forget he played as an amateur and with a wife and two kids he needed to think of the futureOn Ponsford:
What I found perplexing about him is that he retired because cricket got too serious towards the end of his career i.e after Bodyline. He said it wasn't the same cricket as before. Yet he along with Bradman is credited with bringing a determined, grind the opposition into the ground approach to batting. As opposed to their predecessors who gave their wickets to the most deserving bowler. Strikes me as a bit odd. He was only 34 when he retired.
Minewham bam thank you ma'am XI
victor trumper
sanath jayasuriya
clem hill
viv richards
ian botham
kapil dev
shahid afridi
adam gilchrist +
mitchell johnson
jeff thomson
shoaib akhtar
Clarke easily over his career.Clarke Vs Mark Waugh, hmm.