• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

ODI ATG XIs

smash84

The Tiger King
Plenty are rated 'highly enough' yes, but were talking all time XIs here.Viv and Sachin would be neck a neck for the number 2 spot after Bradman imo instead of a 10 way tie with other greats if we take away their final 3 years.

And Ponting would be heads and shoulders clear of Border, Waugh and Chappell as Australia's number 2 if we forget his final 3 years

I think Dhoni has dropped enough for Bevan to be considered a better ODI bat. The thing with Dhoni is he's Bevan and Gilchrist combined which helps his cause.
Really, what exactly was so special of the Viv from 1986-1991?
 

smash84

The Tiger King
sorry, i misread the last part of your statement.

Viv is still rated pretty highly despite very mediocre last few years of his career, basically due to the strength of his first 13 years.

I don't see why the same can't be done for Dhoni
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
wow talk of Rossouw is itstl

surely SA haven't been that desperate for middle-order bats

sorry, i misread the last part of your statement.

Viv is still rated pretty highly despite very mediocre last few years of his career, basically due to the strength of his first 13 years.

I don't see why the same can't be done for Dhoni
that's not really relevant. The issue being discussed isn't that he might not be rated highly at all, its that he might not be rated as highly.
 
Last edited:

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
sorry, i misread the last part of your statement.

Viv is still rated pretty highly despite very mediocre last few years of his career, basically due to the strength of his first 13 years.

I don't see why the same can't be done for Dhoni
I addressed this in my last post I believe
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
Tendulkar
Dev
Viv
Kohli
DeVilliers
Symonds
Klusener
Dhoni
Hadlee
Pollock
Warne


Long shot putting Dev as opener, but why not? I figure his style works anywhere. The same logic to put Gilchrist as opener to smash the ball into submission would work for Dev and his amazing smile would put bowlers off as they run in to get him . Dhoni moves around depending on the situation. Warne only in the team over Brad Hogg because of his ability to step up when required.

Maybe I should have McGrath instead of Pollock. But then I have a bunny in the team.
 
Last edited:

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
Viv & Sachin opening together would be a sight to behold. The sploosh-factor would be off the charts.
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
I do agree it’s bizarre, but we’re picking the best XI players here rather than the best team.

Australia were an amazing team - that had quite a few world class/GOAT level players, often playing at the same time, but you can see an argument being made for not picking any Australian because there were better players in those positions from another 6-7 or so nations across the last 40 or so years.

Ponting is a great example really - world class player, in the discussion for greatest of all time for his position in ODIs but Viv and Kohli are just better (though obviously Ponting has proved his mettle in World Cups).

This level has basically played out across 11 positions - I think the only Australian lock should be McGrath.

The rest are all up for debate/bias based on whose helicopter shot you liked better.
How is McGrath a lock ?

Kapil
Hadlee
Akram
Saqlain
Garner

Akram and Garner most popular GOAT bowler choices

Kapil GOAT allrounder

Saqlain GOAT spinner

1 more spot is available ,

I picked Hadlee , because his bowling easily among the very best and he can bat.

Hadlee is not the only choice too.

Pollock is there , Imran , Donald ..
 
Last edited:

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
How is McGrath a lock ?

Kapil
Hadlee
Akram
Saqlain
Garner

Akram and Garner most popular GOAT bowler choices

Kapil GOAT allrounder

Saqlain GOAT spinner

1 more spot is available ,

I picked Hadlee , because his bowling easily among the very best and he can bat.

Hadlee is not the only choice too.

Pollock is there , Imran , Donald ..
McGrath is a lock because not only was he just as good as the others in normal circumstances, his game went to the next level in important matches. He was the best ODI quick in history IMO. Garner a close second, but Garner played in a different era that devalues his incredible economy a bit.

McGrath, Garner and Akram provides a well rounded fast bowling attack and leaves room for a spinner who can average around 10 (so basically any of the big 3 spinners).

Half of the first XI picks itself:

Tendulkar

Richards
Kohli
De Villiers


Akram

Garner
McGrath

You need to choose between Bevan and Dhoni for a safety net/ finisher role, Gilchrist and Dhoni for the gloves, pick a fifth bowler and pick your spinner of choice.
 

h_hurricane

International Vice-Captain
Tendulkar
Dev
Viv
Kohli
DeVilliers
Symonds
Klusener
Dhoni
Hadlee
Pollock
Warne


Long shot putting Dev as opener, but why not? I figure his style works anywhere. The same logic to put Gilchrist as opener to smash the ball into submission would work for Dev and his amazing smile would put bowlers off as they run in to get him . Dhoni moves around depending on the situation. Warne only in the team over Brad Hogg because of his ability to step up when required.

Maybe I should have McGrath instead of Pollock. But then I have a bunny in the team.
Awesome team this. India really missed a trick by not batting Dev up the order towards the end of his career(he did for a match in 1992 world cup though). Instead we had duds playing first 20 overs for almost nothing till Tendulkar arrived.

Yes, playing Mcgrath instead of Pollock (or may be Hadlee) and moving the others up a slot is a good idea.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
Ditto. It'd be a broadcaster thing then. Hopefully robelinda can help us out on that one in a few years.
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
McGrath is a lock because not only was he just as good as the others in normal circumstances, his game went to the next level in important matches. He was the best ODI quick in history IMO. Garner a close second, but Garner played in a different era that devalues his incredible economy a bit.

McGrath, Garner and Akram provides a well rounded fast bowling attack and leaves room for a spinner who can average around 10 (so basically any of the big 3 spinners).

Half of the first XI picks itself:

Tendulkar

Richards
Kohli
De Villiers


Akram

Garner
McGrath

You need to choose between Bevan and Dhoni for a safety net/ finisher role, Gilchrist and Dhoni for the gloves, pick a fifth bowler and pick your spinner of choice.
Ok , That's your opinion.

Many people rates Akram or Garner as the greatest.
Also McGrath benefitted from playing for an unbeatable team. ( McGrath and Gilchrist are the main reasons for that though.)

There is nothing wrong in selecting Garner , Akram , Hadlee , Kapil and Saqlain combo as it's basically between Garner and McGrath. Hadlee and Kapil allrounders , Akram half allrounder and left hand variety.

For me , The Locks are

Sachin

Viv
Kohli
Abdv
Dhoni
Kapil

Akram

Lara , Hadlee , Saqlain and Garner completes the 11
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
Lara opening , Kapil and Hadlee bowling allrounders

That way you can avoid lesser batsmen ( Gilly , Jayasoorya , Anwar , Mark Waugh, Kallis..) and lesser bowlers ( Klusner , Kallis , Symonds , Watson ..) from the team .
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
Really good bowlers have a strike rate in the low 30's. This quickly tells me an average team would, on average, not be bowled out - probably 9 down, if all 5 bowlers were top class. Put them up against all time great bats and you would expect them to rarely bowl teams out. Therefore, I am thinking that for all time great teams, economy is as important as strike rate, with average being the least useful stat.
As such, I was wondering how does an economy x strike rate rank players? This is what we get

PlayerAveEconSREcon x SR
J Garner*(WI)18.843.0936.5113
SE Bond*(NZ)20.884.2829.2125
MA Holding*(WI)21.363.3238.5128
Sir RJ Hadlee*(NZ)21.563.339.1129
Saqlain Mushtaq*(PAK)21.784.2930.4130
AA Donald*(SA)21.784.1531.4130
BAW Mendis*(SL)21.864.827.3131
GD McGrath*(AUS/ICC)22.023.8834132
Saeed Ajmal*(PAK)22.724.1832.6136
M Muralitharan*(Asia/ICC/SL)23.083.9335.2138
B Lee*(AUS)23.364.7629.4140
Wasim Akram*(PAK)23.523.8936.2141
Waqar Younis*(PAK)23.844.6830.5143
CEL Ambrose*(WI)24.123.4841.5144
NW Bracken*(AUS)24.364.4133146
A Flintoff*(ENG/ICC)24.384.3933.2146
SM Pollock*(Afr/ICC/SA)24.53.6739.9146
M Ntini*(ICC/SA)24.654.5332.6148
CJ McDermott*(AUS)24.714.0336.7148
Shoaib Akhtar*(Asia/ICC/PAK)24.974.7631.4149
Imran Tahir*(SA)24.874.6731.9149
M Morkel*(Afr/SA)25.324.9530.6151
MG Johnson*(AUS)25.264.8331.3151
DW Fleming*(AUS)25.384.4134.4152
JN Gillespie*(AUS)25.424.2136.2152
SK Warne*(AUS/ICC)25.734.2536.3154
DW Steyn*(Afr/SA)25.924.8831.8155
EJ Chatfield*(NZ)25.843.5743.3155
Abdul Qadir*(PAK)26.164.0638.6157
D Gough*(ENG/ICC)26.424.3936158
IR Bishop*(WI)26.54.3336.7159
Imran Khan*(PAK)26.613.8940.9159
KD Mills*(NZ)27.024.7234.2161
GB Hogg*(AUS)26.844.5135.6161
DK Morrison*(NZ)27.534.5336.3164
N Kapil Dev*(INDIA)27.453.7144.2164
WPUJC Vaas*(Asia/SL)27.534.1839.4165
AB Agarkar*(INDIA)27.855.0732.9167
MF Maharoof*(SL)28.064.8934.3168
J Srinath*(INDIA)28.084.4437.8168
PL Taylor*(AUS)28.244.1740.5169
AR Border*(AUS)28.364.6636.4170
MC Snedden*(NZ)28.394.2939.6170
IT Botham*(ENG)28.543.9643.2171
SL Malinga*(SL)28.755.3432.3172
SP O'Donnell*(AUS)28.724.2740.2172
M Prabhakar*(INDIA)28.874.2740.5173
Umar Gul*(PAK)29.345.1933.8175
R Rampaul*(WI)29.355.134.4175
JM Anderson*(ENG)29.224.9235.6175
Abdur Razzak*(BDESH)29.294.5638.4175
JDP Oram*(NZ)29.174.3839.9175
PR Reiffel*(AUS)29.23.9244.6175
Z Khan*(Asia/INDIA)29.434.9335.8176
DJ Bravo*(WI)29.515.4132.7177
JE Taylor*(WI)29.535.2233.9177
Mohammad Sami*(PAK)29.474.9935.4177
IK Pathan*(INDIA)29.725.2633.8178
DNT Zoysa*(SL)29.754.5239.4178
Shakib Al Hasan*(BDESH)29.684.4440178
TM Odoyo*(Afr/KENYA)29.894.638.9179
HH Streak*(Afr/ZIM)29.824.5139.6179
SCJ Broad*(ENG)30.135.2634.3180
CRD Fernando*(Asia/SL)30.25.234.7180
L Klusener*(SA)29.954.738.2180
AG Cremer*(ZIM)30.224.6139.3181
WKM Benjamin*(WI)30.794.1544.4184
A Kumble*(Asia/INDIA)30.894.343185
Mudassar Nazar*(PAK)30.914.2443.7185
NLTC Perera*(SL)31.25.8731.8187
Mashrafe Mortaza*(Asia/BDESH)31.364.839.1188
Aaqib Javed*(PAK)31.434.2844188
Mohammad Nabi*(AFG)31.444.2544.3188
A Nehra*(Asia/INDIA)31.725.1936.6190
SR Watson*(AUS)31.794.9538.4190
JH Kallis*(Afr/ICC/SA)31.794.8439.3190
Abdul Razzaq*(Asia/PAK)31.834.6940.6190
KJ O'Brien*(IRE)31.915.2436.5191
UDU Chandana*(SL)31.94.740.6191
DR Tuffey*(NZ)32.124.8939.3192
BKV Prasad*(INDIA)32.34.6741.4193
M Dillon*(WI)32.444.6142.1194
Rubel Hossain*(BDESH)32.685.634.9195
R Ashwin*(INDIA)32.914.9140.1197
CL Cairns*(ICC/NZ)32.84.8440.6197
JO Holder*(WI)33.055.4736.2198
Saleem Malik*(PAK)33.245.0639.3199
KMDN Kulasekara*(SL)33.924.941.5203
SO Tikolo*(Afr/KENYA)34.24.842.7205
AD Mathews*(SL)34.214.6144.4205
ME Waugh*(AUS)34.564.7843.3207
Shahid Afridi*(Asia/ICC/PAK)34.514.6244.7207
TG Southee*(NZ)34.845.4138.6209
TT Bresnan*(ENG)34.985.4238.7210
CH Gayle*(ICC/WI)35.334.7744.3211
SB Styris*(NZ)35.324.7444.6211
RA Jadeja*(INDIA)35.44.8943.4212
B Kumar*(INDIA)35.914.9843.2215
A Symonds*(AUS)37.25544.6223
E Chigumbura*(Afr/ZIM)42.315.9142.9254

I limited this to the top 100 players on strike rate who had bowled in more than 80 innings, because why not.

Is this worth anything?
 
Last edited:

Top