• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England Tour of West Indies 2019

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
I might be ignorant but don't England play too many multi role players (all rounders and wicketkeeper batsmen)?
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I might be ignorant but don't England play too many multi role players (all rounders and wicketkeeper batsmen)?
It is the players they have that are good. They can't really do much about that. Having said that Broad should obviously have played in this one.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Selection clearly all wrong as well, it is easily to get in a muddle with the set of players England have to pick from but they obviously got it wrong this time.

Still the 3-0 in Sri Lanka means there is some credit in the bank. The West Indies bowling was terrific is as well, only Moeen played a really awful shot.
Yeah, they got the bowling wrong. Two spinners was always going to be silly when the host team pick four quicks. And no way is Curran a test-match opening bowler. But none of that justifies the batting of course. Happy to believe that WI bowled well, but that should be the norm in test matches. Most sides manage not to be bowled out for less than 100.

Reminds me of 2009 when we were bowled out for 50 in the first test and that was the end of any interesting cricket in the series.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah, they got the bowling wrong. Two spinners was always going to be silly when the host team pick four quicks. And no way is Curran a test-match opening bowler. But none of that justifies the batting of course. Happy to believe that WI bowled well, but that should be the norm in test matches. Most sides manage not to be bowled out for less than 100.

Reminds me of 2009 when we were bowled out for 50 in the first test and that was the end of any interesting cricket in the series.
Can't see the rest of this series being like that one given the nature of the two sides, should be a good one actually.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Been such a **** show over here this season that waking up to this score has been the highlight.
 

Tom Flint

International Regular
That bowling from windies was top class, and Guyana hammered much of this team 2 weeks ago on their own on this ground
 
That bowling from windies was top class, and Guyana hammered much of this team 2 weeks ago on their own on this ground
Guyana wore down that Barbadian team in the first innings.

That was a classic game which was entertaining. The writing off of Guyana before the match even started.
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
Also is this the first England team in a long time that's better against spin than pace?
 

Tom Flint

International Regular
We haven't won over here since 2004 complacency from our media in the build up was wrong to anyone who seriously follows cricket
 

Top