Ooh look at the kids of today. So edgy.The Australian Sunilz finally here to complete this shitfest.
Was coin tosses to be fair and that is sad for India. If Australia batted first and won Adelaide it have turned into a whitewash. If Australia batted first in Melbourne.... Oh who am I kidding.Congrats to India who looked easily the better side in both series for mine. Unlucky not to win the Test series 3-1.
I don't think so. I believe he was pretty self sufficient right until the end stretch.Did the Don needed any personal care assistants in his old age?
To help shower him and laced up his boots?
Toss had very little influence at Perth. Same as Adelaide tbh. Melbourne and Sydney were the games where the toss had a big impact.If India won the toss at Perth......
Shocking post.Unprecedented levels of whining from Australian fans on this thread and it started long before sunilz and co. got stuck in their craw. If they won the toss, if they held on to their catches, if only they used DRS better, if Smith and Warner played...almost (but not quite) makes me wish Siddhu was around to shut them up with his trolling. You put out a **** team, they got beat, that's that. Not getting another chance until India returns to Oz either.
Dumb post. Not wrong that there's been a lot of "whining" but it's hardly without reason. Warner and Smith voluntarily being left out in an unprecedented fashion undoubtedly decided the series. Pretty fair to be whining about that tbh, that sort of thing doesn't happen very often.Unprecedented levels of whining from Australian fans on this thread and it started long before sunilz and co. got stuck in their craw. If they won the toss, if they held on to their catches, if only they used DRS better, if Smith and Warner played...almost (but not quite) makes me wish Siddhu was around to shut them up with his trolling. You put out a **** team, they got beat, that's that. Not getting another chance until India returns to Oz either.
IMO cribbing about the toss is a privilege that should only be applicable for the visiting team. Smith was certainly a big loss but I am not too sure about Warner.Dumb post. Not wrong that there's been a lot of "whining" but it's hardly without reason. Warner and Smith voluntarily being left out in an unprecedented fashion undoubtedly decided the series. Pretty fair to be whining about that tbh, that sort of thing doesn't happen very often.
The tosses were potentially decisive too but you can say that about a lot of Test series.
Yeah whinging about the toss almost happens every Test series by whichever teams loses the most tosses. I'm not saying that the tosses didn't favour India this series, they absolutely did, but if they had gone the other way then India would be complaining about them and have every right to.IMO cribbing about the toss is a privilege that should only be applicable for the visiting team. Smith was certainly a big loss but I am not too sure about Warner.
I don't want to live on this planet any more.the last few posts have been bad and you should all feel bad
No I'm pretty clearly saying that it's ubiquitous and pointlessYou fools are surely not going to start a debate about the whineiness of the toss after my obviously deprecating post are you?
Nobody is crediting the series win to the tosses. They are merely saying it was an important factor.To summarise last few posts can i say that AUS won in 2007-08 because they batted first at MCG and sydney and also umpiring favoured AUS at sydney. When IND batted first at Perth in 2007-08 they won the test and at Adelaide they drew the test . So can i credit AUS 2007-08 series victory to toss and umpiring ?
Results | Australia v India 2007-08 | ESPNcricinfo.com