Yes, the reason I was optimistic in the first place. Once we made that mountain of runs, this Test was always going to assume a very "Indian" character with the two spinners in tandem.So, what of all this 'picking two spinners will be a disaster' Ghambiring?
Could use a batsman averaging 61 right now.Bring back Voges
Mate. It dipped in the sense gravity did its thing. Nothing more. Terrible shot.Dont know what the coms are on about. It wasnt a full toss. He came way down the track, misjudged the trajectory and it dipped on him and got the toe end. Good bowling.
If Tendulkar played 10 years less, there would be even less of an argument. He’d have finished his career averaging close to or almost 60, most of it in the 90s when everyone else was struggling to average 50.Tendulkar-vs-Dravid argument is settled by longevity. If Tendulkar played for 10 less years then I don't think the comparison could be settled so easily, at least not in favour of Tendulkar. In future, Kohli-vs-Pujara comparison can become like (Tendulkar minus 10 years)-vs-Dravid
If he had ended his career at the end of 2002, he would have played 105 tests at an average of 57.58 with 31 centuries. Pretty good career still.If Tendulkar played 10 years less, there would be even less of an argument. He’d have finished his career averaging close to or almost 60, most of it in the 90s when everyone else was struggling to average 50.
Just one of those unlucky things. Happened to Pujara too.Mate. It dipped in the sense gravity did its thing. Nothing more. Terrible shot.
Yadav ripped oneJust watched the highlights package..... has the ball gone be off the straight today?
Not really. It's turned less than last year and the year before. It might as well be concrete, except our batting is too rubbish to even take advantage of that.Just watched the highlights package..... has the ball gone be off the straight today?
No turn whatsoever. Bit of reverse for Shami though.Just watched the highlights package..... has the ball gone be off the straight today?