StephenZA
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Pretty much my view on the subject, I just stopped trying to argue it... particularly people wanting to get rid of the umpires soft signal because cameras are 'better'.anyway my strong view on this whole subject is that the soft signal system should remain as it is. furthermore, what constitutes clear evidence to overturn the soft signal should consist only of clear evidence that the ball has bounced. not "touched one blade of grass", not "been close to the ground", but bounced, i.e. had a clear change of momentum from down to up that is not the result of the fielder's actions.
so this would be still not out under that framework.
I'm not quite sure I saw it clearly bounce... but I did think it was not clean caught. I would not have been to upset if given out based off the umpires soft signal.
Last edited: