Best insultathlais morphed into a dirty knee jerker. never believed in nicholls, now piling on the bloke who hasn't bowled in ages after one poor game. he'll probably vote new zealand first next.
I was at the game and thought he looked like the quickest on show today, what’s speeds was he hitting? This was difinatley the hardest I’ve ever seen him run in, usually he sort of just lumbers in like he was just going to roll his arm over. He was quite impressive.Splendid comeback from Neesham. Was probably happiest about his performance with the ball than anything else. His talent with bat in hand has never been in question.
He was up to 140. Definitely looked like he'd stepped it up - from his most recent NZ appearances, at least. Maybe in the further-back past he's been at those levels as well.I was at the game and thought he looked like the quickest on show today, what’s speeds was he hitting? This was difinatley the hardest I’ve ever seen him run in, usually he sort of just lumbers in like he was just going to roll his arm over. He was quite impressive.
At fastest, 138-141. But Boult was 140-143 and Ferguson 145-148 at quickestI was at the game and thought he looked like the quickest on show today, what’s speeds was he hitting? This was difinatley the hardest I’ve ever seen him run in, usually he sort of just lumbers in like he was just going to roll his arm over. He was quite impressive.
The problem with henry isn't that he had one bad game, it's that he bowls 135 seam up without any swing or variation. There's a pretty low ceiling on how successful that sort of bowling can be in modern ODIs. He needs to do two out of the following three to be a long term prospect:athlais morphed into a dirty knee jerker. never believed in nicholls, now piling on the bloke who hasn't bowled in ages after one poor game. he'll probably vote new zealand first next.
henry had his outswinger last time he bowled in nz (i don't remember the uae odis) but for the outswinger to work there has to be swing around. no one swung the ball last night.The problem with henry isn't that he had one bad game, it's that he bowls 135 seam up without any swing or variation. There's a pretty low ceiling on how successful that sort of bowling can be in modern ODIs. He needs to do two out of the following three to be a long term prospect:
a) put on 10kph
b) rediscover his outswinger
c) Improve his slower ball
you don't get to duck out of this one. even if you did say that you were as fast as the rest of this lot to call for his dropping.Nor was I ever especially critical of Nicholls, I even once compared him to a young Ross Taylor which is basically the highest praise possible.
I absolutely hope I'm wrong on this one. Either way I agree he should get this and the bangladesh series now that we've picked him.henry had his outswinger last time he bowled in nz (i don't remember the uae odis) but for the outswinger to work there has to be swing around. no one swung the ball last night.
if we give a bloke one game to prove himself after 2 months of no cricket then we are trash, especially when we've completely dropped the ball with developing our bowling stocks post-2015 wc. jamieson, kuggs and tickner might be ready, but in the nz a games they got carted as often as they succeeded.
he used to be consistently 140-145 in his first spell so im going to attribute the lack of speed to rustiness. he's always been a **** death bowler.
they were also all terrible last night, neesham and maybe sodhi excepted. boult has been up and down all season and last night wasn't good.