• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Big Bash League 2018-19

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I know right, Flem should have made him madder and talked more over him.

And drop no 5 or 6 I believe
It was pretty interesting actually. Never heard slats act like that in ten years as a channel 9 guy

He seemed to have no patience for Flem's jokes
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It was pretty interesting actually. Never heard slats act like that in ten years as a channel 9 guy

He seemed to have no patience for Flem's jokes
He had batsmen to chat with for 15 years, the egos melded.

And drop 6 or 7, have to recheck thread
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Wonder if there was a bit of elitism too. Like us test commentators know more then you big bashers lead by Howie
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sangha and Sams have saved the Thunder here. Not sure Stars can chase this, they are not a batting team.

I think Beer might be done. Doesn't really deserve a place with Zampa/Lamichane/Maxwell in the team, and I was thinking at the start of the game that Stars have way too many bowlers and not enough batting. Gulbis, Stoinis and Maxwell all pretty much playing as specialist batsmen, it's a waste. But then I realised they probably don't even have any good batsmen in reserve if Larkin is in the XI.

Is Aus cricket in such a batting slump that you're better off picking a 7th bowler in your T20 team than another batsman, because they all suck?
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't think the Thunder top 4 is quite as good as you guys are saying. i think ferguson/root back to back carries the risk of a pair of 20 off 20 ball innings in the middle overs. on the flip side, i really like the risk they're taking with sams/green at 6 and 7.
 

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
Sangha and Sams have saved the Thunder here. Not sure Stars can chase this, they are not a batting team.

I think Beer might be done. Doesn't really deserve a place with Zampa/Lamichane/Maxwell in the team, and I was thinking at the start of the game that Stars have way too many bowlers and not enough batting. Gulbis, Stoinis and Maxwell all pretty much playing as specialist batsmen, it's a waste. But then I realised they probably don't even have any good batsmen in reserve if Larkin is in the XI.

Is Aus cricket in such a batting slump that you're better off picking a 7th bowler in your T20 team than another batsman, because they all suck?
Honestly not sure what the point of Gulbis is in this team, he didn't bowl at all, probably isn't going to contribute 4 overs reliably, and unlike Maxwell or Stoinis he doesn't have the body of work with the bat at this level to be play as a batsman alone.

That being said, he probably would have been worth a try instead of keeping on with spin when the ball was wet and being dispatched.

EDIT: Starfighter beat me to it
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Honestly not sure what the point of Gulbis is in this team, he didn't bowl at all, probably isn't going to contribute 4 overs reliably, and unlike Maxwell or Stoinis he doesn't have the body of work with the bat at this level to be play as a batsman alone.

That being said, he probably would have been worth a try instead of keeping on with spin when the ball was wet and being dispatched.

EDIT: Starfighter beat me to it
Yeah but, even if he doesn't bowl, do they really have a batsman in reserve better than Gulbis? As I said, selecting Larkin would indicate that they don't.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Wonder if there was a bit of elitism too. Like us test commentators know more then you big bashers lead by Howie
You can just see it can't you. All the commentators have their meeting pre-tournament at Channel 7 HQ to discuss how to go about it. Then Slats walks in 20 minutes late, tries talking to everyone making jokes as he grabs the chair at the head of the table and puts his feet up. Then he talks about how he worked with Richie Benaud, who anointed Slats his successor on his deathbed for years doing real commentary, and then tells everyone to go **** themselves and this is the way we should do things. Every time Brad Hodge has a suggestion Slats laughs over him and tries to remind Hodge of how many tests he played. Brayshaw says something and Slats lays into him about his entire career from the moment he picked up a bat as a child.

Thankfully, this would only be deja-vu to Ricky and Flem.
 

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah but, even if he doesn't bowl, do they really have a batsman in reserve better than Gulbis? As I said, selecting Larkin would indicate that they don't.
I would be utterly stunned if they didn't have anyone better. Would take a mediocre specialist over a mediocre bits and pieces man anyday
 

Top