• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Sri Lanka Tour of New Zealand 2018/19

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
860 runs in 3 days for 13 wickets - you've gotta wonder if that pitch is worthy of an ICC sanction. The basin staff have got to come up with a better plan for exciting cricket than "leave a forest on it and hope you get through 2 innings inside the first 5 sessions."

Hagley has typically produced wickets that keep a bit of life and pace over the 5 days, so weather permitting there should be a result.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
We have done it before, when Vaas and Murali were together in 1995. Vaas was literally unplayable in some sessions in that series.
SL's first overseas win came in NZ 1995 at Napier. That was eventually a series win of 1-0 in 3 games.
Vaas was an excellent bowler, especially for NZ conditions. Didn't realise that was SL's first ever overseas win. Amazed Murali was around back then - 1995 seems so long ago. I probably watched some of the series at the time (I was a kid) - I have a vague recollection of Larsen trying to bat out time at the end, though that could also have been another match. That was also the series that did for Ken Rutherford's captaincy.

Looking back at those reports is a great exercise in nostalgia, in the same way we can be nostalgic about embarrassing and bad fashion from the past. The last good late-80s/early-90s NZ players had gone, a couple of new players had appeared who would be good performers by the late 90s, but in between times it was awful.

Wisden - First Test
Scorecard
Wisden - Second Test
Scorecard

JFC that NZ bowling attack in the second test after Nash and Morrison were injured in the first - Su'a, Walmsley, Pringle, Larsen, Dipak Patel. No wonder they couldn't bowl SL out to level the series. Of course, it was a golden period of SL batting too.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
I'm a little concerned that the Hagley pitch will be similar to the Basin, becoming very flat as the match progresses - as has already been pointed out, that's where Sodhi and Wagner batted out the second test against England earlier in the year.

I think it will be a little quicker than the Basin, at least, which should give the bowlers a bit more to work with.
 

The Hutt Rec

International Vice-Captain
Vaas was an excellent bowler, especially for NZ conditions. Didn't realise that was SL's first ever overseas win. Amazed Murali was around back then - 1995 seems so long ago. I probably watched some of the series at the time (I was a kid) - I have a vague recollection of Larsen trying to bat out time at the end, though that could also have been another match. That was also the series that did for Ken Rutherford's captaincy.

Looking back at those reports is a great exercise in nostalgia, in the same way we can be nostalgic about embarrassing and bad fashion from the past. The last good late-80s/early-90s NZ players had gone, a couple of new players had appeared who would be good performers by the late 90s, but in between times it was awful.

Wisden - First Test
Scorecard
Wisden - Second Test
Scorecard

JFC that NZ bowling attack in the second test after Nash and Morrison were injured in the first - Su'a, Walmsley, Pringle, Larsen, Dipak Patel. No wonder they couldn't bowl SL out to level the series. Of course, it was a golden period of SL batting too.
The mid-90s were definitely the darkest days for NZ cricket that I remember. Also the period I think where it lost its relevance with the NZ public, and has never fully got back to where it was, imo. I read Geoff Howarth’s book about his time as coach recently, and no matter what you think of him, NZ Cricket sounds like an absolute amateur shambles at the time.

i have to admit I don’t recall this series at all ... definitely blocked from my memory, because it sounds like a shocker.
 
Last edited:

Grasshopper

State Vice-Captain
That '95 series against SL was a shocker. Not only did we have a decidedly average team, but I seem to recall their sportsmanship being called into question a few times as well. Pretty sure Rutherford successfully appealed for a run out when the Sri Lankan batsman jumped to avoid being hit by the ball being thrown unnecessarily hard back to the keeper. Not a great time to be a Kiwi supporter.
 

Maximas

Cricketer Of The Year
That '95 series against SL was a shocker. Not only did we have a decidedly average team, but I seem to recall their sportsmanship being called into question a few times as well. Pretty sure Rutherford successfully appealed for a run out when the Sri Lankan batsman jumped to avoid being hit by the ball being thrown unnecessarily hard back to the keeper. Not a great time to be a Kiwi supporter.
That match report posted earlier from the first test details this - was actually poor officiating as well apparently, as the batsman (Samaraweera) was within his right to do so without danger of being run out having already made his ground
 

Grasshopper

State Vice-Captain
That match report posted earlier from the first test details this - was actually poor officiating as well apparently, as the batsman (Samaraweera) was within his right to do so without danger of being run out having already made his ground
Cheers, I hadn't clicked that link. I remember at the time being pretty disappointed with the team's attitude. It seemed as though they went into the test with an inflated sense of entitlement, and they resorted to unedifying, petulant behaviour when the uppity Sri Lankans began to outplay them. I was unimpressed with Rutherford's captaincy and thought he set quite a poor example to the team, tbh.
 

Moss

International Captain
And at this stage, SL are at a pretty low ebb (although the batting has shown a bit of promise so far) with the incumbent spinner both old and not that good and the fast bowlers are as pedestrian as ever (handy at times but never going to win matches against good opposition).

NZ have put together one of the strongest teams they ever have arguably, would be quite the disaster if SL walked away with a win in the 2nd test really
Disaster from a NZ perspective maybe, but test cricket keeps giving you wake up calls. Pakistan supporters could be forgiven for feeling similarly before the third test of the recently concluded NZ series. Also this is SL's third tour to NZ in 5 years so that's got to count for something, by now the likes of Chandimal, Mathews, Kaurnaratne et al have their own plans in place. Plus, NZ going all square into a decider they are expected to win comfortably, so a bit more pressure on them than the Lankans.
 

Moss

International Captain
The mid-90s were definitely the darkest days for NZ cricket that I remember. Also the period I think where it lost its relevance with the NZ public, and has never fully got back to where it was, imo. I read Geoff Howarth’s book about his time as coach recently, and no matter what you think of him, NZ Cricket sounds like an absolute amateur shambles at the time.

i have to admit I don’t recall this series at all ... definitely blocked from my memory, because it sounds like a shocker.
Didn't watch the vast majority of that season as the only thing televised in India was that weird 4 nation centenary ODI series, but man that was such a dysfunctional time, kept getting reports of how unhinged the players were becoming. Apart from the marijuana episode in SA, there was Thomson being hungover after a night out in the middle of a test match, Su'a squabbling with the caprain, Pringle being banned by Auckland for reasons I can't recall, Crowe stirring controversy by being unavailable during the Windies series but still playing for Wellington, and Jones being called out of retirement and getting his average lowered in the process.

Recall reading sonewhere that for one of those centenary ODIs at Eden Park they actually announced Crowe was on the team sheet (even though he was out injured) just so that they could get more spectators in. If true, sums up what desperate times those were.
 

Migara

International Coach
Sri Lankan test side never had four batsmen in the top 20 at the same time, ever, IIRC. Now Karunarathne, Chandimal, Mathews and Mendis all are in top 20. Statistically this is the strongest SL team when it comes to batting.
 

Maximas

Cricketer Of The Year
Interesting to note that outside of those batsmen in the top 20 at the time the next best was Prasanna Jayawardene at 61st or so. Not a dissimilar situation these days where the batting burden falls on a few, with occasional contributions from the others.
 

Gomez656

U19 Cricketer
2nd Test, Sri Lanka tour of New Zealand at Christchurch, Dec 26-30 2018 | Match Preview | ESPNCricinfo

26/12 - 03:30 AM IST
2nd Test, Sri Lanka tour of New Zealand at Christchurch,

Big picture

Sri Lanka fight at the strangest times. They had several opportunities to dig themselves out of holes against England, at home, on turning tracks specifically prepared to suit them, and yet, what defiances they could muster in that series were insufficient to prevent a whitewash. Somehow, in New Zealand - a country where this group of players had only previously tasted defeat - two batsmen mounted a daylong resistance.

Vitally, in the first away match of six consecutive Tests in the southern hemisphere, Sri Lanka have proved to themselves that their batsmen are not all hopelessly out of their depth. That at least in batting-friendly conditions, they are capable of quelling high-quality seam attacks - the likes of which they will now continuously face until March. Importantly, it wasn't just Kusal Mendis and Angelo Mathews who succeeded. Opener Dimuth Karunaratne and wicketkeeper-batsman Niroshan Dickwella also made runs on day one, when conditions were at their toughest

New Zealand, who have now missed the chance to go to second on the rankings (because only a whitewash against Sri Lanka would have got them there), will perhaps not fret over the Wellington result. Unlike the Basin Reserve surface, the one at Hagley Oval tends to remain receptive to seam bowling right until the final day, particularly if it is very green to begin with, as seems to be the case. Where the Basin track got slower each day, the one at Hagley tends to hold its pace throughout the Test as well. If Sri Lanka had to step up their batting to deal with Tim Southee, Trent Boult and Neil Wagner in Wellington, they will have to climb another rung to face them down in Christchurch.

On top of this, New Zealand's powerful batting order. Jeet Raval generally sees through the worst of the new ball, even if he doesn't quite move on to a substantial score. Kane Williamson seems to begin innings like he's already batting on a hundred, while Tom Latham and Henry Nicholls are also in excellent form. Ross Taylor and Colin de Grandhomme are capable of momentum-shifting knocks, and BJ Watling is often a reliable producer from the lower order. All of which begs the question - have New Zealand ever had it this good?

Sri Lanka have already sprung one surprise in the series. Although they have arrived in Christchurch full of confidence, they will probably need to spring another one in the Boxing Day Test.

Form guide
Sri Lanka DLLLW (completed matches, most recent first)
New Zealand DWLWD

In the spotlight
Neil Wagner has 154 wickets and has bowled in 73 Test innings, but has never collected poorer figures than he did in the second innings at Wellington, when he went wicketless for 100. Beyond the lack of success, Wagner might also be irked at his economy rate of 4.34, in an innings where no other bowler gave away more than 2.5 an over. His short bowling was defanged by a pace-less track, for sure, but there was also the matter of Mendis and Mathews playing him exceedingly well - New Zealand coach Gary Stead later remarked that theirs was "some of the best batting" he had seen against Wagner. For so long "Wagnerline" has worked wonders at home, uprooting stubborn batsmen and sparking collapses after the new-ball swing has disappeared. With Matt Henry forever on the heels of the incumbent seamers, Wagner will want to prove that Wellington was an anomaly.

The Sri Lanka attack, meanwhile, is ostensibly led by the senior Suranga Lakmal, but it is 21-year-old Lahiru Kumara who brings the real energy. He was comfortably the quickest bowler of the first Test, and created more chances on a flat surface than any of his colleagues, claiming 4 for 127 in New Zealand's only innings. He also had an excellent tour of West Indies earlier this year, where he took 17 wickets at less than 20 apiece, so if the Hagley Oval pitch is as seam-friendly as expected, Kumara may have another chance to establish himself as Sri Lanka's primary overseas wicket-taker.


There is an outside chance Matt Henry will play, but New Zealand will probably stick to the same XI that played in Wellington.

New Zealand (probable): 1 Jeet Raval, 2 Tom Latham, 3 Kane Williamson (capt), 4 Ross Taylor, 5 Henry Nicholls, 6 BJ Watling (wk), 7 Colin de Grandhomme, 8 Tim Southee, 9 Neil Wagner, 10 Ajaz Patel, 11 Trent Boult

As Kasun Rajitha went wicketless in Wellington, Sri Lanka may be tempted to swap in Dushmantha Chameera, who averages 24.00 in New Zealand, but has not played a Test since late 2016, largely due to injury. Otherwise, it will probably be the same side.

Sri Lanka (possible): 1 Dimuth Karunaratne, 2 Danushka Gunathilaka , 3 Dhananjaya de Silva, 4 Kusal Mendis, 5 Dinesh Chandimal (capt), 6 Angelo Mathews, 7 Niroshan Dickwella (wk), 8 Dilruwan Perera, 9 Suranga Lakmal, 10 Dushmantha Chameera, 11 Lahiru Kumara

Pitch and conditions
A green, seaming track is expected, but showers may interrupt play on the first two days. Clouds overhead may mean that the ball swings more. Sri Lanka will be especially unimpressed to note that the temperature is unlikely to make it out of the teens until days three and four, with wind-chill likely to make it seem even colder.

Stats and trivia
Neil Wagner's bowling average against Sri Lanka is 38.92 and his economy rate is 3.78 - both his worst against any team he has played. Wagner has only bowled to Sri Lanka across four Tests in New Zealand.

Lahiru Kumara's bowling average this year is 26.66, despite having played two of his five Tests on flat pitches, in Chittagong and Wellington.

With one Test to go, two Sri Lanka batsmen are among the top five run-scorers for the year. Kusal Mendis is third, with 941 runs at 47.05 (he has a chance of being the second after Virat Kohli to make 1000 runs in the year). Dimuth Karunaratne is fifth, with 736 runs at 52.57.

Among batsmen with more than 400 runs this year, Kane Williamson (66.77) and Henry Nicholls (61.87) comfortably have the best averages.

Quotes
"We weren't surprised by the way Sri Lanka played in Wellington. They are a very good side. They showed a lot of character and grit in that second innings. We're preparing for them to be exactly the same in this Test."

New Zealand batting coach Craig McMillan

"We've got some confidence. Angelo is batting really well and knows how to play in these conditions. Kusal has got runs as well. I'm sure Dimuth and the others will chip in as well."
Sri Lanka wicketkeeper-batsman Niroshan Dickwella
 

Top