India would still be ahead with 40 to go.20 more from these two and I'll legitimately start getting nervous.
I meant when they picked him in the squad. Can't say it worked in SA but they definitely got it right with respect to the long term.He hits the bat hard and can reverse it, so he's in the game in Australian conditions. More so than Kumar or Shami imo. Having said that, I cant' say I'd seen a lot of him before this tour.
What'd he say? Got the sound off atm.Punter lying through his teeth to McGraths question
About 40-ish. Under 50, I'd be actually worried. 40 and it's definitely in Australia's favor.75 needed. At what stage do Indian's get genuinely worried (and I don't mean ***** who would claim to be worried if they still needed 400 with 1 in hand)?
If these two can somehow get it down to 25 needed, 8 down... it'll be back to 50/50 imo.
Yes, I will start worrying if it comes down to <40 runs with these 2 still standing.75 needed. At what stage do Indian's get genuinely worried (and I don't mean ***** who would claim to be worried if they still needed 400 with 1 in hand)?
If these two can somehow get it down to 25 needed, 8 down... it'll be back to 50/50 imo.
Supposedly the Aus team have been told it wouldn't have been overturned anyway. Which is stupid. Now seems if it's given you have to prove 100% he didn't hit it.Oz are going to rue the Finch non review aren't they ?
Yeah fair call that.I meant when they picked him in the squad. Can't say it worked in SA but they definitely got it right with respect to the long term.