Agricultural
Banned
In my view Porter is unlucky he’s not played a test yet in England.Welcome back to County Championship Cricket Worcestershire : 32/6
Porter 5/13
In my view Porter is unlucky he’s not played a test yet in England.Welcome back to County Championship Cricket Worcestershire : 32/6
Porter 5/13
If they had needed to rest either Anderson or Broad, would he have been the opening bowler picked? Or would they have asked Curran to open?In my view Porter is unlucky he’s not played a test yet in England.
Doubt he would have played even with Broad out. Top class county champ players are getting done dirty by the selectors right now.If they had needed to rest either Anderson or Broad, would he have been the opening bowler picked? Or would they have asked Curran to open?
You'd presumably employ the brainless system we have now for division two, whereby you lose two home fixtures and two away fixtures. This year for instance Durham didn't go to Lord's nor Canterbury and didn't welcome Glamorgan and Gloucestershire. Who, what system, dictates what teams you miss is a good question?In theory, I'm in favour of that, assuming there's still 2 up and 2 down. Much more stability in terms of who stays in D1, which is a good thing.
The problem would be squeezing the extra four matches in. Given the additional 100 ball competition, we'd end up finishing the CC in October and starting it in March.
It's a problem, granted, especially with the additional one-day tournament. Personally I'd ditch that and half the number of 2020 games at the group stage to make room for the extra CCYou'd presumably employ the brainless system we have now for division two, whereby you lose two home fixtures and two away fixtures. This year for instance Durham didn't go to Lord's nor Canterbury and didn't welcome Glamorgan and Gloucestershire. Who, what system, dictates what teams you miss is a good question?
Regrettably you're right. I can only offer my preferences.The Twenty20 will not be truncated. The counties just recently were arguing for more games!!
I would agree. 5 (home) games per season in three regional groups, North, South-East, South-West. The twenty20 drags on and on.Regrettably you're right. I can only offer my preferences.
I believe Surrey's side is good enough to be highly competitive at test level against the international sides. They need to keep the foot on the gas.Self evident point but Surrey really do have a strong side, especially with the bat.
LibbyNotts are signing basically everybody. Joe Clarke's apparently next.
They do when everyone's available, plus they've bought in Dean Elgar. Their batting didn't look so strong at the start of the season when nobody had heard of Ollie Pope and Sam Curran hadn't made those scores to set up the wins in tests 1 and 4. Having seen matches when Ryan Patel as batting at 4 and Will jacks at 6, we've not always been so strong, at least on paper. Thankfully someone's always stepped up and made sure we made a competitive score, and the lower order have bailed us out on more than once occasion. But actually the bowling's been the major factor, especially once Morkel was fit enough to play.Self evident point but Surrey really do have a strong side, especially with the bat.
Odds on him getting a test call up once he has moved to a bigger county?Notts are signing basically everybody. Joe Clarke's apparently next.
Playing in D1 instead of being relegated to D2 will help. But is his track record all that anyway? Maybe scoring more consistently would help. And if he's serious about playing test cricket, he should be pushing to bat at 3 for Notts.Odds on him getting a test call up once he has moved to a bigger county?