Well Stokes is playing as a batsman as he is unfit to bowl. Makes our side even more ridiculous.You pick 6 bowlers and Jennings still has to bowl? Damn
So we knew this before the start? It's as bad as playing a batsman with a fractured finger. I'd look into any suspicious betting patterns around the St Johns Wood area.Well Stokes is playing as a batsman as he is unfit to bowl. Makes our side even more ridiculous.
Yeah. Got plenty of likes out of it though. If you missed out, too bad.Did Gnske go postal earlier on?
My xmas stocking was filled. For a moment there I thought he was wholeheartedly agreeing with my thoughts on Indian team selection.Yeah. Got plenty of likes out of it though. If you missed out, too bad.
That's the point, isn't it. Without Stokes you need another seamer instead of two spinners.I can see why Bairstow and Stokes have played only as batsman in this game. I mean they are only competing with Vince and Pope and I'd back Bairstow and Stokes to be better bats than either of them.
If they knew Stokes wasn't going to bowl though, I'd have preferred to see Rashid out and Porter in.
A lot of it down to English incompetence tbf, so there's no sympathy for them.Kohli's had his fair share of luck this series, but tbf he's so good you can't really begrudge him it.
Claiming it because I never ****ing get these. 46 counts as early for Kohli this series!I'm liking Curran to knock over Kohli early this knock. Not sure why.