On the flip side, it is also ****oo of people trying to say it doesnt give an advantageI liked how it put a nice big hole through the "win toss, bat first, win match in India" crowd that attributed all our home wins to getting the best use of the conditions.
Williamson/Taylor - those NZers all look the same to meRoot should bat 4, according to Butcher, just like Williamson does
It gives no advantage or disadvantage to India, last time I checked the stats they win more matches batting second.On the flip side, it is also ****oo of people trying to say it doesnt give an advantage
the wheel is foreverJennings isn't very good is he?
So are you saying at 10:30 am on the first day of a test match there are already footmarks on the pitchIt gives no advantage or disadvantage to India, last time I checked the stats they win more matches batting second.
Maybe winning the toss and batting first gives some slight chance to the opposition to stay in the game longer, but ultimately winning in India boils down to them playing well and India playing poorly, end of. Same goes when India win. Nothing to do with tosses whatsoever.
I think over rates would be back down to eighties levels if umpires called all the no-balls that actually happened. Not that they're far above these days.I blame the umpire tho. WAC.