Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sure but he won’t maintain that batting average. It’s only so high because half his knocks have been red-inks. Averaging 50+ is just a guide because of what it tends to correlate with (consistency and tons). It means a lot less if someone’s doing it via not-outs.Serious question, if someone managed that stats as their overall average, would they be considered a better cricketer than Bradman? You're probably taking a Top 5 batsman and bowler in the same player.
Bowls beautifully in England, though. And his contributions with the bat have been really, really good. But world-beater as an allrounder? Nah.
Last edited: