fredfertang
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Flibberty, I apologise unreservedly for knocking your demonstrably sensible attitude to a meaningless fixturePost reported - flibberty's account has clearly been hacked
Flibberty, I apologise unreservedly for knocking your demonstrably sensible attitude to a meaningless fixturePost reported - flibberty's account has clearly been hacked
See, if we try, we can learn something from any one at all. Even from the Australians.Flibberty, I apologise unreservedly for knocking your demonstrably sensible attitude to a meaningless fixture
I was surprised at first, but it actually seems like a sensible decision. There isn't really any stand-out player from India, just good performances by different guys each time.Another set of awards dubiously adjudged by clueless commentators, Sharma wins MoTm & MoTs
With us doing well for a change in the world cup this series has passed me by till today. The start of the one dayers will be the same as we wait for what we pray will be an appearance in the final or not care as we will be so gutted at losing, come the tests though I will be well into it.Flibberty, I apologise unreservedly for knocking your demonstrably sensible attitude to a meaningless fixture
All I know is that Stokes was cleared to bowl, and he should have bowled his wide yorkers again at the back end. Ball was awful.Only got the first 10 of the chase. Stokes was bowling well and surprised not to see him bowl out? Did he get injured or was he only allowed to bowl 2 due to physio orders?
Good chase from India, highest ever against England in t20 by any team. I still think 185 was par on that surface and chasing 199 to win was a good effort
Funny how bowling can cost you games regardless of how deep you batAll I know is that Stokes was cleared to bowl, and he should have bowled his wide yorkers again at the back end. Ball was awful.
Thinking that Root shouldn't be a certain starter for all formats is plain wrong
Uhmm Ball bats 11, Stokes batted 5 - where you going with this?Funny how bowling can cost you games regardless of how deep you bat
try againUhmm Ball bats 11, Stokes batted 5 - where you going with this?
3rd T20I, India tour of Ireland and England at Bristol, Jul 8 2018 | Match Summary | ESPNCricinfotry again
Ugh don't do this again. It was just an observation, stating the obvious really, that bowling can be decisive in games and it's not all about stacking the team with batsmen. I found it mildly humorous that you posted that observation despite your often conflicting opinion.3rd T20I, India tour of Ireland and England at Bristol, Jul 8 2018 | Match Summary | ESPNCricinfo
Ball bats 11, Stokes batted 5 - what would I be trying again?
I said the guy who bats 5 should have bowled at the end instead of the guy who bats 11. So I really don't see why you'd find it that funny. Perhaps you missed that part despite thinking about bat deep. Besides with WIlley at 7 - England isn't all that deep.Ugh don't do this again. It was just an observation, stating the obvious really, that bowling can be decisive in games and it's not all about stacking the team with batsmen. I found it mildly humorous that you posted that observation despite your often conflicting opinion.
I don't know why you are telling me of 2 players' respective batting positions
Reason for batting position given in your first post above when you made batting deep relevant. Ball is a true number 11. He isn't a batsman by any stretch. In fact, England looked light with Willey at 7 - India had Raina or Dhoni to bat 7 if needed as Pandya was promoted.Funny how bowling can cost you games regardless of how deep you bat
Ugh none of this is relevant. It was just a straightforward, easy to understand (I thought) observation. You don't have to react like this every time someone responds to you. Sometimes posts are just posts, not everything is an attack.I said the guy who bats 5 should have bowled at the end instead of the guy who bats 11. So I really don't see why you'd find it that funny. Perhaps you missed that part despite thinking about bat deep. Besides with WIlley at 7 - England isn't all that deep.
Reason for batting position given in your first post above when you made batting deep relevant. Ball is a true number 11. He isn't a batsman by any stretch.