trundler
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I know you said *almost* all but Marshall was fairly chest on.No.
Very ugly aesthetically though, like almost all chest on bowlers.
I know you said *almost* all but Marshall was fairly chest on.No.
Very ugly aesthetically though, like almost all chest on bowlers.
And I wouldn't describe his action as beautiful by any stretch of the imagination. Very interesting and good to watch though.I know you said *almost* all but Marshall was fairly chest on.
Wouldn't call it beautiful either but the variety of bowling actions is part of cricket's charm. Very effective though. Holding and Donald have the best actions I've seen.And I wouldn't describe his action as beautiful by any stretch of the imagination. Very interesting and good to watch though.
Actually forgot NCN, definitely in the frame if fit.Looking at the averages for the last ODI series played, it appears they just dropped the 3 lowest averaging batsmen that weren't captain
Cricket Records | Records | South Africa in Australia ODI Series, 2018/19 - Australia | | Batting and bowling averages | ESPNcricinfo
Considering Mmarsh was dropped for that series, and hasn't done anything to warrant a return, I guess he's there for potential
I like this. I'd play Zampa over Lyon and maybe M Marsh over Stoinis but it's pretty close to our best.This would be my WC squad as it stands:
1 Warner
2 Finch
3 Smith
4 Darsh
5 Maxwell
6 Stoinis
7 Wade
8 Cummins
9 Starc
10 Lyon
11 Haze
12 Handscomb
13 NCN
14 M Marsh
15 Not sure yet, I want a backup spinner but I don't love any of them. Agar or Zampa at the moment I guess
He's too old to have been coached out of it and into the batsmen feeding long hops that are the reason why we can neither bat nor bowl in T20Is.Was delivering a really consistent yorker length throughout the last Big Bash.