Not at all. So Starc bowls instead of Tye - bowls 9 overs for 60 instead of 100 - (thats 40% less runs than the best IPL death bowler!!!!)"Not enough to restrict a team like this"
"Australia needs more aggressive batting"
"outdated mode of ODI cricket"
etc. etc.
Saving Miyagi the trouble. Even he must get sick of posting the same thing over and over eventually.
Shame the world cup is next year and Aus's away record suggests they just don't know how to play away (or at home)You're completely underrating how important taking wickets in a world cup is IMO
starc and haze just got abused by England's LO team in Aus.i love to piss on australias sycophantic overhype of every glass sculpted goon who can bowl once a year more than most, but are we seriously going to debate the difference of starc/haze/cummins versus a bowling attack that contains someone with parents deranged enough to call their son Jhye?
yup. it's almost like the two previous world cup finalists made it there based on blasting the opposition out with the ball as well as scoring lots of runs.You're completely underrating how important taking wickets in a world cup is IMO
I am - because I rated their bowling before this tour. The problem is their batting and Steve Sandpaper Smith (aka Nissan SSS) doesn't solve their problem.i love to piss on australias sycophantic overhype of every glass sculpted goon who can bowl once a year more than most, but are we seriously going to debate the difference of starc/haze/cummins versus a bowling attack that contains someone with parents deranged enough to call their son Jhye?
Of course he does, but he doesn't drop 481 to under 400 :P Heck - even if he doesn't bowl at all - you're going for over 300 and have next to 0 chance of chasing it down.I know Australia getting paddled brings all the posters to the yard but I can't believe Im having argument as to whether Starc and co would improve our bowling attack or not.
exactly. Starc has been serving up filth in England ever since he set foot on these shores. 481 could be 520 if he's true to form.Starc has a poor record against England in ODI cricket. Probably skipped this tour to protect his average.
Saw England smash in 2018, seemed the history flattered him.i think i've rewritten history too well. we actually have real live posters who don't remember mitchell starc's odi bowling
That's a poorly simplistic way to look at itHow many runs would Starc go for vs England on his best day?
A 20 runs
b 40 runs
c 60 runs
Subtract the answer above from 481 :P
is that you richard?How many runs would Starc go for vs England on his best day?
A 20 runs
b 40 runs
c 60 runs
Subtract the answer above from 481 :P
If Starc has a good day that 481 could drop to 250 or lower. Even on a pitch like this. Especially if he has Hazlewood & Cummins for back-up. Aus had England 5 for 8 at Adelaide just 6 month ago (and that was without Starc).Of course he does, but he doesn't drop 481 to under 400 :P Heck - even if he doesn't bowl at all - you're going for over 300 and have next to 0 chance of chasing it down.
6.56 at over 36. Starc the king maker between 6th Aus and Eng #1 - no.That's a poorly simplistic way to look at it
Please. 6.56 at home.If Starc has a good day that 481 could drop to 250 or lower. Even on a pitch like this. Especially if he has Hazlewood & Cummins for back-up. Aus had England 5 for 8 at Adelaide just 6 month ago.
It's like you've forgotten what cricket was before yesterday. Not every game is a slogathon.