Isn't he? A lot of people say he is tbhShakib's not a complete *****tick
That is actually genuinely eye-opening. Didn't realise that at all.With the bat Shakib averages 28 against Australia, 25 against Eng, 26 against India and 20 against SA.
He's a decent spinner, but I fail to see why he is rated highly as an all-rounder in a world context.
I mean even I have to say this is a ridiculous comparison.
All Botham ever did was bash around cheating Aussies who bet on themselves to lose. Shakib is literally the greatest ever cricketer his country has produced, and has single handedly made history on numerous occasions. It's not even close
Doesn't really contradict Red Hill's post, that his batting has been lacking against major opponents. He wasn't disputing the bowling.Whereas Botham averaged 29 v Aus, 21.4 vs WI and 13.66 v SL.
Shakib's weakness has been against India. While he averages only 28.75 with the bat against Australia, he was bowling at 22.5. Vs England 25.66 with the bat, bowling at 29.27. And he averages just 11 with the bat in SA, but bowls at 20.81.
But in 6 tests vs India so far, he really has done next to nothing.
I could be wrong, but I suspect that Shakib's dbl century in NZ is the only batsman to score a dbl in NZ vs Boult, Wagner and Southee as a trio. Not sure about overseas.
Still Botham's batting average of 29 and 21 against WI and Aus isn't exactly spectacular compared to Shakib's.Doesn't really contradict Red Hill's post, that his batting has been lacking against major opponents. He wasn't disputing the bowling.
Also not sure if SL were particularly one of the best teams in Botham's day. Seems like you just picked them because he had a low average against them.
What is a major opponent? I wasn't trying to contradict Red Hill, I was merely giving further information for people to chew on. But further given NZ is currently a top 4 side, and last month were top 3 ahead of Aus and Eng, I think Shakib's record against NZ is relevant. Pakistan were number 1 not long ago, so his batting record against them is relevant. And yeah, low averages happen from time to time given small sample sizes.Doesn't really contradict Red Hill's post, that his batting has been lacking against major opponents. He wasn't disputing the bowling.
Also not sure if SL were particularly one of the best teams in Botham's day. Seems like you just picked them because he had a low average against them.
Yeah technically, but let's be honest here . . .What is a major opponent? I wasn't trying to contradict Red Hill, I was merely giving further information for people to chew on. But further given NZ is currently a top 4 side, and last month were top 3 ahead of Aus and Eng, I think Shakib's record against NZ is relevant. Pakistan were number 1 not long ago, so his batting record against them is relevant. And yeah, low averages happen from time to time given small sample sizes.
If you want to take it further, lets look at Beefy's batting record post Boycott and his bowling record post Willis