Victor Ian
International Coach
...except for us dicksStop arguing guys, at the end of the day you're all ****s
...except for us dicksStop arguing guys, at the end of the day you're all ****s
Bullshit we were self governing by that date. Each of the colonies may have been fairly self contained but we didn't end up with different railway gauges in NSW, Vic and Qld for no reason.They are not ''arbitrarily-selected dates''. You were largely self-governing by the 1860! It is fact.
HitlerSo when do we start talking about Hitler?
.......(yep I know I just did that!)
Ah, Clouderson. What a ****.Yeah, spot on. Acting like a **** and then having a cry when you get it back is very unbecoming of a sportsman.
The Ashes: James Anderson says Australia is bullying England - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
S Kennedy gets both his sense of justice and his history of British colonialism from the Daily Mail, apparently.
That is quite easy to fathom as you weren't federated until 1901.Bullshit we were self governing by that date. Each of the colonies may have been fairly self contained but we didn't end up with different railway gauges in NSW, Vic and Qld for no reason.
There was quite a bit going there.
How is Britain meant to be the guilty of post-1860 crimes against aborigines when she had already conceded legislative and executive control of domestic affairs to five/six Australian states (even before federation) who now elected their own parliaments which enacted legislation? It is a constitutional impossibility! Heck, by the twentieth century Australia was being accepted as a full ''imperial'' partner herself. Australia sent troops to the Boer War, and colonial theatres during the two world wars. Australia even received League of Nation mandates (i.e., New Guinea, Nauru): in other words, Australia in 1919 now held an empire herself!****ing lol at trying to wash your hands of the colonisation of Australia
You're too much Kennedy
I don't get any of that. Not even a little bit.Moises Henriques @Mozzie21
Dave Warner was the player’s most vocal voice during MOU negotiations, copping it from many. Now, ‘caught ball tampering’ trying to selflessly advantage the fast bowling unit - not for his own stats or personal gain. Rightly punished... but he’s a team man.
Who tf cares? Unless you were personally involved then it's nothing to do with you and why would you feel guilty about it?****ing lol at trying to wash your hands of the colonisation of Australia
You're too much Kennedy
not giving a **** isn't the same as taking responsibility forThat's actually a ****ing terrible take on historic events tbh. Straight from the JWH playbook of not giving a **** because you didn't do something yourself.
I feel 10,000 brain cells less off for having read this tweet. How much dumb can you fit into 140 characters?Don't really follow the logic of Moises Henriques latest take on this.
By his logic, if a player pays off an opposition to throw the game can that be forgiven because he was being 'selfless' and doing the 'team thing'?
In what context though? Refusing to take responsibility in the way of wanting government benefits abolished isn't the same as refusing to take direct responsibility and call yourself a terrible person because of your ancestors. I'm not disagreeing with you we're just talking about different things. No one's saying that just because something happened generations ago it means that it's irrelevant now.I'm well aware of that. A nation as an institution can't go glibly by just not acknowledging **** it's done in the past. It would be very convenient if they could, but it shouldn't work that way.
I often hear people in Australian take the "it wasn't me so why should we take responsibility" POV on historic wrongs meted out to indigenous people in particular. They're usually Tories (so by definition backwards and unintelligent) and they're usually the same people who head off to dawn services on ANZAC Day before playing two-up at the local RSL then getting on TV to insist the Japanese government apologise for the way Australian POWs were treated in WW2. It's almost invariably an interesting exercise in hypocrisy.