NotMcKenzie
International Debutant
Seems a little presumptuous. If the bowler can identify the sides of the ball when it's handed to him and make it swing*, he'll be able to do it regardless of how the ball reached the state it was in. And I'm not sure a bowler would be any more privy to decisions taken off the ground than on it.See no evil on the field, maybe... does not mean they don't know what evil is being done through discussion off the field. When you elect somebody to do a job like look after the ball, you gonna want to know that he can do the job as a bowler.
But could Bancroft do the job as bowler?
*In my experience, one does not necessarily imply the other.