Its in this video:This problem is always going to be there when it's something so subjective that can have such severe consequences. You're going to miss a game because people think you broke some vague rule on conduct? IDK, the whole structure feels a bit wrong.
Having said that, if Rabada has received warnings before then he deserves to be punished for ignoring them. I'm sure there are better ways of conveying your dislike for certain rules/policies without outright breaking them and forcing the match referee's hand.
I still haven't seen what happened btw. Link anyone?
not available in my territory
I'm not rolling over at all. I want them to ditch the whole system and I think SA management should fight it to the best of their ability. I just don't think you can say Rabada is without fault here. For an exaggerated example, it'd be like a batsman who thought the lbw law was against the spirit of cricket just padding up all the time because he didn't believe in the rule. I'd agree he was at fault even if I agreed with him about the rule.No, **** that. You don't just roll over like that. You really lose when you roll over. Get the authorities to treat actions independently, honestly, and without signalling.
And by "you" here, I mean the SA team and management.
When SA have done that they get flack.... even in the last incident with QDK, the minute CSA and management decided to oppose all sorts of comments were being said "why does he not just cop his demerit like Warner did... " even though he really did nothing wrong (provided that sledging is acceptable!).No, **** that. You don't just roll over like that. You really lose when you roll over. Get the authorities to treat actions independently, honestly, and without signalling.
And by "you" here, I mean the SA team and management.
What I loved about that was the 'audible' obscenity... hence why Aus wanted the mikes turned down these matches? So if it is not broadcast it is acceptable?Not only has he been made aware multiple times, he's even been rubbed out for the same **** before.
Yeah, that's where we disagree here.I'm not rolling over at all. I want them to ditch the whole system and I think SA management should fight it to the best of their ability. I just don't think you can say Rabada is without fault here. For an exaggerated example, it'd be like a batsman who thought the lbw law was against the spirit of cricket just padding up all the time because he didn't believe in the rule. I'd agree he was at fault even if I agreed with him about the rule.
At least there is 4 tests not just 3.... thinking that TV is getting good viewing for this series, even if stadiums not full.If anything, you certainly can't say that this series has been short of bravado on the players' behalf.
Great series thus far, RSA should walk this one in. All eyes will shift towards the 3rd Test (not enough IMO). Bring back the 5 Test series.
Four is fine IMO.If anything, you certainly can't say that this series has been short of bravado on the players' behalf.
Great series thus far, RSA should walk this one in. All eyes will shift towards the 3rd Test (not enough IMO). Bring back the 5 Test series.
So, it's 2nd session day 1. Philander has taken the only two wickets, gone for less than a run an over and is looking like a threat with every ball. The other guys have gone at about 5 an over.
What odds do you need to bet that Philander won't get another wicket all match and will be the most expensive quick for the rest of the match?
The shoulder bump is definitely against the rules. Whether or not it would have even been noticed if not for the virtue signalling is a different matterYeah, that's where we disagree here.
Don't think he is at fault even under the current rules.
I'm pretty sure it would have.The shoulder bump is definitely against the rules. Whether or not it would have even been noticed if not for the virtue signalling is a different matter