Can they first learn to win without the likes of Bumrah,Bhuvi first?Wouldn't mind seeing a full strength Sri Lanka v India U-17s, might be a good contest
Good effort by SL to beat India "C". This must be one of the greatest victories in SL's recent history I'd imagine.Can they first learn to win without the likes of Bumrah,Bhuvi first?
India U17s LOL.
What did Sanjay say sometime back?Even a Ranji team can play better.Guess the likes of Unadkat,Chahal,Pant never made it to the Ranji level.
This is why teams resting so many players is ****, SL are on a hiding to nothing. If they lose it's embarrassing because they lost to an A side, if they win they don't get as much credit because everyone's just like "eh it was against a reserve side anyway".Well done to SL on a good first win today. We can only play against the opposition we are presented with..
Long way to go but wins bring confidence..
So what are the India A and B lineups then? Would love to know.Good effort by SL to beat India "C". This must be one of the greatest victories in SL's recent history I'd imagine.
What a frightening proposition, sure am glad India doesn't have to play against opposition of that calibreSo what are the India A and B lineups then? Would love to know.
Just in case if you didn't know this was SL's C team as well.
No,
Mathews
Malinga
Asela Gunaratne
Lakmal
Munaweera
Dickwella
Christ dude let it go. You're a trolls best dream.So what are the India A and B lineups then? Would love to know.
Just in case if you didn't know this was SL's C team as well.
No,
Mathews
Malinga
Asela Gunaratne
Lakmal
Munaweera
Dickwella
Look at that line up. Stuff of nightmares.So what are the India A and B lineups then? Would love to know.
Just in case if you didn't know this was SL's C team as well.
No,
Mathews
Malinga
Asela Gunaratne
Lakmal
Munaweera
Dickwella
In all seriousness I don't think there's a single player in there that would make a full strength side of any of the big teams. Mathews might have pushed for a spot when he was at his best, but would have been in and out of the side. Naming Malinga is a joke, it would be like Australia saying they aren't at full strength because Shane Watson, Mike Hussey, Shaun Tait and Dirk Nannes aren't playing.Look at that line up. Stuff of nightmares.
Dickwella would walk into both Australia's LO outfits. Far better than Carey/Nevill/Wade or whatever.In all seriousness I don't think there's a single player in there that would make a full strength side of any of the big teams. Mathews might have pushed for a spot when he was at his best, but would have been in and out of the side. Naming Malinga is a joke, it would be like Australia saying they aren't at full strength because Shane Watson, Mike Hussey, Shaun Tait and Dirk Nannes aren't playing.
The rest are genuine nobodies. Haven't even heard of a couple tbh.
You haven't seen enough of CareyDickwella would walk into both Australia's LO outfits. Far better than Carey/Nevill/Wade or whatever.
Mathews is an obvious choice. But I think you are selling Malinga short here. He's been a fantastic performer for SL in LOI's. He's clearly past his best now but in his pomp he'd walk into any big LOI side quite easily I think.In all seriousness I don't think there's a single player in there that would make a full strength side of any of the big teams. Mathews might have pushed for a spot when he was at his best, but would have been in and out of the side. Naming Malinga is a joke, it would be like Australia saying they aren't at full strength because Shane Watson, Mike Hussey, Shaun Tait and Dirk Nannes aren't playing.
The rest are genuine nobodies. Haven't even heard of a couple tbh.
India have been playing Test cricket for so much longer than Sri Lanka. There's something seriously wrong with their setup if their All time XI teams don't have more depth than a country like Sri Lanka. I think they've been particularly poor at finding top fast bowlers. Guys like B Kumar are almost in their first XI despite playing only 21 games.I saw all those All time XI threads. We can find out about the A and B sides of India when the Indian thread opens up.
Yeah, agreed. I mean, I have no doubt that Sri Lanka will lose to a full strength Indian side, but we barely get any credit for a win against a team like this. India are strong enough to beat anyone in these formats but it just seems disrespectful to play such an understrength side against us. I don't agree with the tone randycricfreak is taking here, but I understand it.This is why teams resting so many players is ****, SL are on a hiding to nothing. If they lose it's embarrassing because they lost to an A side, if they win they don't get as much credit because everyone's just like "eh it was against a reserve side anyway".
It's really not fair
agree with you and as I said before, all we can do is try to beat the team that is put in front of us and keep progressingThis is why teams resting so many players is ****, SL are on a hiding to nothing. If they lose it's embarrassing because they lost to an A side, if they win they don't get as much credit because everyone's just like "eh it was against a reserve side anyway".
It's really not fair
There were plenty of random T20I series throughout the season where one or two of them could have had a look in. Rotation works well when two or three players sit out and two or three come in. In the next random series rotate out a different 2 or 3. Ultimately you're putting out a reasonably strong team capable of winning games, while also trying out new players and strengthening your squad. India have the luxury to be able to do it without impacting series results too badly, they just don't have good management to figure it out.It's all right imo. If you aren't going to give B players a chance in a random T20I series scheduled after a long season, then when are you going to do it?