morgieb
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Was close though, can forgive the umpire for missing that.You know if the umpire actually did the job they were paid to do that would be avoided.
Was close though, can forgive the umpire for missing that.You know if the umpire actually did the job they were paid to do that would be avoided.
It does amaze me how it is the umpire's fault when the bowler bowls a no ball...You know if the umpire actually did the job they were paid to do that would be avoided.
If it had been called on field the review would not have been wasted. That's the problem here. Nothing to do with whether or not the bowler overstepped.It does amaze me how it is the umpire's fault when the bowler bowls a no ball...
Yes, they should get the calls right, but it is still the bowlers fault.
And he gave it 'not out'. Even the umpires are against us. Is the line too thick? Someone help us ffsYou know if the umpire actually did the job they were paid to do that would be avoided.
If the umpires don't call it, then it's only natural for the bowler to assume they're fine.It does amaze me how it is the umpire's fault when the bowler bowls a no ball...
Yes, they should get the calls right, but it is still the bowlers fault.
The review would not have been lost if the bowler had not over stepped...If it had been called on field the review would not have been wasted. That's the problem here. Nothing to do with whether or not the bowler overstepped.
FTR it isn't a wasted review, you don't lose reviews for no balls.If it had been called on field the review would not have been wasted. That's the problem here. Nothing to do with whether or not the bowler overstepped.
Completely and utterly missing the point.The review would not have been lost if the bowler had not over stepped...
On a ball to ball basis? Close NB. And if it is a consistent thing of continuous NB not being called, fine... but what we have now is people noticing the occasional NB not called. What their are 10 NB in an innings, max? Maybe an additional 5 are missed? I cant say for sure, but ultimately it is in the bowlers control.If the umpires don't call it, then it's only natural for the bowler to assume they're fine.
That was the first no ball called in the innings. How are the bowlers meant to know?On a ball to ball basis? Close NB. And if it is a consistent thing of continuous NB not being called, fine... but what we have now is people noticing the occasional NB not called. What their are 10 NB in an innings, max? Maybe an additional 5 are missed? I cant say for sure, but ultimately it is in the bowlers control.
I get your point, and now we know the review is not lost.... but my point is it is entirely within the bowlers control; let's stop blaming the umpire for 'causing' the NB.You don't? Okay then it's not as much an issue. I just assumed you would for some reason.
Completely and utterly missing the point.
Test batting average confirms.Bit like Yuvraj in his batting.
By playing very wellI reckon Anderson should try bowling with the keeper up. Just for the heck of it. It might stop those drives at least.
I can't believe Mitchell ****ing Marsh is going to get an Ashes hundred.
Haha, ODI average too though.Test batting average confirms.
Where did I say he hadn't?By playing very well