Stokes Arrested

[Woodster]

Something doesn't stop being **** just because it's your "opinion" I'm afraid.

Boring now mate

 

[fredfertang]

haha sledger is so eagerly circling this thread just waiting to pounce on the next poor bastard to say something incorrect

Woodster is right - the law is crap

#staffsolidarity

 

[Woodster]

Woodster is right - the law is crap

#staffsolidarity

Haha! I like to think my point wasn’t quite as blunt or as ignorant as that! Maybe not.

 

[sledger]

Boring now mate

Then stop ****ing chipping away at it. I had said my bit, but you continually make snippy remarks and bringing it back up.

 

[fredfertang]

Haha! I like to think my point wasn’t quite as blunt or as ignorant as that! Maybe not.

There are plenty of crap laws out there - sledger and I would both be out of a job if there weren't

 

[sledger]

There are plenty of crap laws out there - sledger and I would both be out of a job if there weren't

Oh I completely agree. It just gets my goat massively when someone says how crap these laws are, but then can't actually identify any.

 

[Woodster]

Then stop ****ing chipping away at it. I had said my bit, but you continually make snippy remarks and bringing it back up.

More than happy to leave it providing you stop asking me for evidence!

 

[Woodster]

Anyway......what do we think are the chances of Stokes appearing at Perth? Complete guesswork required but thoughts?

 

[sledger]

More than happy to leave it providing you stop asking me for evidence!

I've never asked for any evidence, because we haven't even yet been able to establish what you are talking about.

For the ****ing millionth time, the question I have asked you is: Which law(s) in your eyes are unsatisfactory?

 

[Woodster]

I've never asked for any evidence, because we haven't even yet been able to establish what you are talking about.

For the ****ing millionth time, the question I have asked you is: Which law(s) in your eyes are unsatisfactory?

Is that a ‘yes’ Stokes will be available for Perth, or a ‘no’?

 

[sledger]

Is that a ‘yes’ Stokes will be available for Perth, or a ‘no’?

And for the millionth time, deliberate obfuscation.

I suppose I only have myself to blame, not sure why I expected anything else.

 

[fredfertang]

I've never asked for any evidence, because we haven't even yet been able to establish what you are talking about.

For the ****ing millionth time, the question I have asked you is: Which law(s) in your eyes are unsatisfactory?

Mr Vicente, please stop badgering the witness

 

[Woodster]

Mr Vicente, please stop badgering the witness

Yes Mr Vicente, please stop boring the witness!

 

[sledger]

 

[Woodster]

You know my stance on the Stokes situation with regards those that initiated probably getting off with a lighter punishment, that was my point. You jumped all over a comment I made with regards a perception and opinion I have, I’m not going to quote laws to you about ones I agree with or disagree with as I honestly don’t have the slightest inclination to do so as I’d rather talk about cricket.

 

[fredfertang]

All the best advocates have a quality flounce - academia's gain was the Bar's loss

 

[sledger]

You know my stance on the Stokes situation with regards those that initiated probably getting off with a lighter punishment, that was my point. You jumped all over a comment I made with regards a perception and opinion I have, I’m not going to quote laws to you about ones I agree with or disagree with as I honestly don’t have the slightest inclination to do so as I’d rather talk about cricket.

Yeah, heaven forbid you actually substantiate the claims you make. Or even explain their basis. But yeah, whatever, as you will.

 

[sledger]

All the best advocates have a quality flounce - academia's gain was the Bar's loss

No, it was everybody's loss.

 

[fredfertang]

No, it was everybody's loss.

True - should've given you a job when I had the chance

 

[sledger]

True - should've given you a job when I had the chance

Hahaha, if wishes were fishes...