Stokes Arrested

[Woodster]

Why does Stokes get arrested for protecting some gay people while this assault from Sledger goes unpunished?

Because he instigated it!

 

[sledger]

I haven't said the law is no good full stop.

A crap opinion ? What are you 12 years old ?

If it makes you feel better (more right) then absolutely, my position on this debate is completely, and I'd throw in utterly aswell, worthless, if you say so. And it clearly doesn't say good things about my intellectual capacity.

Yes, I keep asking, WHICH law are you talking about?

You concede that you have a poor grasp of the topic, but your posting suggest you have no grasp of it whatsoever.

 

[Starfighter]

This conversation/discussion/argument has gone from dispiriting to anger inducing.

 

[Woodster]

Yes, I keep asking, WHICH law are you talking about?

You concede that you have a poor grasp of the topic, but your posting suggest you have no grasp of it whatsoever.

Seriously mate, I've said what I wanted, I'm pretty sure you have more important things to do as I'm beginning to find this rather tedious. We've clearly found a subject you feel confident enough to exert an educated opinion on and are now droning on about it.

 

[Woodster]

This conversation/discussion/argument has gone from dispiriting to anger inducing.

Apologies, has gone some way off-track.

 

[sledger]

Seriously mate, I've said what I wanted, I'm pretty sure you have more important things to do as I'm beginning to find this rather tedious. We've clearly found a subject you feel confident enough to exert an educated opinion on and are now droning on about it.

All I have done is asked you to explain your position. You can't/won't.

 

[the big bambino]

He is just saying that the instigators of the incident will likely be treated leniently compared to Stokes who intervened to end it. Irrespective of what the law says he thinks it unjust as every subsequent thing arose from the instigator's actions and they should bear responsibility for them.

 

[Woodster]

He is just saying that the instigators of the incident will likely be treated leniently compared to Stokes who intervened to end it. Irrespective of what the law says he thinks it unjust as every subsequent thing arose from the instigator's actions and they should bear responsibility for them.

Put better than I ever could!

 

[StephenZA]

I think we all know what he is saying... the point is that in this incident nothing has been decided, and regards his general opinion, it is based on pure anecdote and has no real value. Sledger called him out on that last point.

 

[sledger]

He is just saying that the instigators of the incident will likely be treated leniently compared to Stokes who intervened to end it. Irrespective of what the law says he thinks it unjust as every subsequent thing arose from the instigator's actions and they should bear responsibility for them.

Yeah, apart from the bit about the law being unfit for purpose; a completely unsubstantiated remark.

 

[Woodster]

Oh please.

 

[sledger]

Oh please.

 

[Spikey]

god i can't wait for stokes to get charged so we can get some new bad discussion

 

[TNT]

Well they don't have the jurisdiction to stop him from playing in NZ for one.

Thats incorrect, the ECB had to provide a No-Objection Certificate.

 

[sledger]

Itstl

 

[TNT]

inttsqr

 

[Daemon]

haha sledger is so eagerly circling this thread just waiting to pounce on the next poor bastard to say something incorrect

 

[mr_mister]

Seriously mate, I've said what I wanted, I'm pretty sure you have more important things to do as I'm beginning to find this rather tedious. We've clearly found a subject you feel confident enough to exert an educated opinion on and are now droning on about it.

rekt

 

[Woodster]

haha sledger is so eagerly circling this thread just waiting to pounce on the next poor bastard to say something incorrect

Or just have a different opinion!

 

[sledger]

Something doesn't stop being **** just because it's your "opinion" I'm afraid.