I’m not being defensive. Australia uses inter-WC jam odi series as trials, and have since forever. He’s being trialled to see how he goes. He deserves more than one gamethen why get so defensive when we say he should be dropped
i don't i just through it was funny how clueless Cartwright lookedthe more relevant question would be why you’d gaf about a series like the other than to trial blokes pre-WC
Actually a good point. The hypothesis that dropping Cartwright is the right thing to do is heavily reliant on the flawed assumption that the Australian selectors actually give a **** about whether or not they win this series.the more relevant question would be why you’d gaf about a series like the other than to trial blokes pre-WC
Actually a good point. The hypothesis that dropping Cartwright is the right thing to do is heavily reliant on the flawed assumption that the Australian selectors actually give a **** about whether or not they win this series.
For all we know they'd rather lose the series to build a friendly relationship with the BCCI.
Actually a good point. The hypothesis that dropping Cartwright is the right thing to do is heavily reliant on the flawed assumption that the Australian selectors actually give a **** about whether or not they win this series.
For all we know they'd rather lose the series to build a friendly relationship with the BCCI.
There are a number of truths in cricket. Among these are:i don't i just through it was funny how clueless Cartwright looked
There are a number of truths in cricket. Among these are:
1. It has a crazy way of rewarding hard work
2. The wheel is forever
3. Australia DAGF about inter-WC Odis then win the WC afterwards
4. The wheel is forever