AndyZaltzHair
Hall of Fame Member
Got ticket for tomorrow. Will be interesting day of play. Rain pls dont interrupt.
sadly this is probably trueAnyway Aust are still comfortably ahead in this game imo. Renshaw looked fine and Smith is looking good for a ton already and tomorrow is the best batting day. Batting the whole day tomorrow and a session on day three is still on.
Irrelevant because The Ashes will not be played in Asia.So who is less prepared for the Ashes?
Also 1sr lollapse of the series right here. Australia to be all out for less than 100
Or anywhere where it swings.Irrelevant because The Ashes will not be played in Asia.
Thinking this has any relevance to the Ashes is like judging a professional Tennis player's chances in an upcoming tournament based on his latest round of recreational golf. Or an MMA fighter in a boxing match.So who is less prepared for the Ashes?
Also 1sr lollapse of the series right here. Australia to be all out for less than 100
I'd say it could swing at Melbourne (or even Brisbane at a stretch), but it won't swing anywhere near as much as it would in England.Or anywhere where it swings.
WACA would swing plenty but they're not playing there are they? Hobart will probably have the best chance of swing depending on the weather, and there should be plenty of reverse in Sydney. Also Adelaide with the new ball if it's a day-nighter but I don't remember if it is or not.I'd say it could swing at Melbourne (or even Brisbane at a stretch), but it won't swing anywhere near as much as it would in England.
By the time we get to Melbourne you may already have series in bag or be 2-0 up anyway. I guess the Adelaide test is the one we don't know about as the lights may cause it to do something it wouldn't normally do there.I'd say it could swing at Melbourne (or even Brisbane at a stretch), but it won't swing anywhere near as much as it would in England.
Well we do it as we don't have any bats better than our bowlers who can bat. Can't see why Bangladesh dropped one of their best bats though.Why are Bangladesh playing 6 bowlers? Same thing England did recently. Seems like a waste of a spot when you could just play an extra batsman.
I don't get why teams are doing this. It's not like this is a road.
Maybe that Nasir Hossain guy is a more of a batsman even though he's at 7, not sure. Just really don't see why you would need 3 specialist spinners, let alone 4.Well we do it as we don't have any bats better than our bowlers who can bat. Can't see why Bangladesh dropped one of their best bats though.
Nasir and Miraz are supposed to be allrounders. So it's really 2 quick bowlers, 1 full time spinner, Miraz+Shakib, and then Nasir who can bowl a bit.Why are Bangladesh playing 6 bowlers? Same thing England did recently. Seems like a waste of a spot when you could just play an extra batsman.
I don't get why teams are doing this. It's not like this is a road.
Like you have never derailed any thread at all have you?Mods should really infract all Ashes talk in this thread
FFS you have your own thread to talk about your meaningless mid table clash that no one else but you lot care about
Mate when I do it its entertainingLike you have never derailed any thread at all have you?
Plus the "Road To" thread.Mods should really infract all Ashes talk in this thread
FFS you have your own thread to talk about your meaningless mid table clash that no one else but you lot care about
Yea they missed a trick not playing Swepson for Cummins IMO2 pacers is a dumb selection no matter which way you look at it.