Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
Separation of concerns...different teams work on the code for formatting and the code for finding the bowler, batsman, and outcome. And because people are encouraged not to give the outcome any formatting sugar, that should be the responsibility of the formatting code.Yeah, that's what I surmised was going on. Doesn't seem to affect actual typed commentary, see ball 3.4 below
View attachment 23581
where the bolding of each occurrence of the word 'four' is correct (unless it automatically picked up both and they corrected it manually).
I guess after every ball, the commentator clicks a button with the outcome of the delivery and the software generates "<bowler> to <batsmen>, <outcome>," and then runs the search to bold things as appropriate, then they type the rest and manually put things in bold as the see fit. But is there any reason why they couldn't just make FOUR or OUT or whatever be in bold by default and not need to search for keywords?
In theory a good idea, in practice can lead to mind-numbing errors. Like most engineering paradigms