Rahul is extremely talented and plays spinners / pacers with equal ease.I personally think that If he can just stop getting injured he has got enough quality to be the best batsman in a team having Pujara/Rahane/Kohli.Sixth successive 50 for Rahul, impressive consistency especially after his wildly inconsistent start to his test career. Also, one more away from equalling the record for successive 50s.
There is? Why? If im not mistaken, didnt india also play sl like a year or two ago? Idk who's bright idea it was but sure looks good for a certain team to pad its stats.There is a return series later this year. :P
There is? Why? If im not mistaken, didnt india also play sl like a year or two ago? Idk who's bright idea it was but sure looks good for a certain team to pad its stats.
Ok so i kinda understand sl touring india but why are india touring sl? Werent they in sl recently??That has nothing to do with it. FYI, SL have not been in India for a full tour in ages. Also, SLC voted with the BCCI in the ICC voting. It all adds up.
Yep. Highlights were that heartbreaking 1st test and Ashwin dominating Sanga in his farewell series.Ok so i kinda understand sl touring india but why are india touring sl? Werent they in sl recently??
Ok so i kinda understand sl touring india but why are india touring sl? Werent they in sl recently??
Also, when Hardik is playing, he should be at 6/7 or he should not be playing at all. He will anyways bowl only a few overs. Order should be Hardik, Saha, Ash/Jaddu. A slightly similar situation to England though not exactly the same in terms of quality.I'd really be thinking about not batting Ashwin so high when India have so many runs on the board. He's going to have to bowl a lot of overs so unless his batting contribution was crucial I'd not send him out at six. I could understand if it was 100/4, but 350/4 it seems like a pointless overburdening.
Never puts too much effort in batting though, comes in, hits 8-10 well timed fours, gets out somewhere between 30-50.I'd really be thinking about not batting Ashwin so high when India have so many runs on the board. He's going to have to bowl a lot of overs so unless his batting contribution was crucial I'd not send him out at six. I could understand if it was 100/4, but 350/4 it seems like a pointless overburdening.
.Cricbuzz Commentary said:Nishant says: "Why not have an update of reviews pending in the commentary section?" -- Because I work on the assumption that true cricket fans should remember two things: McGrath's wicket tally and the no. of reviews left at any given time of any given match