MW1304
Cricketer Of The Year
Nah we owe Dawson and his one apparent skill - reviewing.Opened crapinfo. Headline said Amla solid as lead passes 300. Clicked link to see he was out just that ball. You English CW fans owe CI one here, I think.
Nah we owe Dawson and his one apparent skill - reviewing.Opened crapinfo. Headline said Amla solid as lead passes 300. Clicked link to see he was out just that ball. You English CW fans owe CI one here, I think.
Bavuma must be due a blob
Nah we owe Dawson and his one apparent skill - reviewing.
They have a coach for everything else so yeah. Joe should let Cook retain the right, he was always discerning.The England set up surely has room for a DRS coach, right?
I like to use a bottle top on the keyboard - reverse gambhiring - it seldom works, but looks good when it doesYour posts are always the highlight of any England series thread, Fred. Juz love how well you come across as a biased England fan without ever treating the opposition team/fans/posters/players with any disrespect.
I don't think you can blame Root when his vice captain adamantly wanted to review one crashing into 4th or 5th stumpThey have a coach for everything else so yeah. Joe should let Cook retain the right, he was always discerning.
With Bayliss in charge no chance.SA batted perfectly, slower and steady. England could learn a lesson, but they won't
May have been hoping for glove, Stokes was certain though ffsThat's nowhere near plumb enough for that sort of appeal.
Seen another example just now. The captain has to be the discerning figure since bowlers are often adamant they should be reviewing ones that aren't close enough. Keeper also helps in this regard.I don't think you can blame Root when his vice captain adamantly wanted to review one crashing into 4th or 5th stump
So not Stokes in the gully then?Keeper also helps in this regard.
Haha no not usually.So not Stokes in the gully then?