Dendarii
International Debutant
It would definitely be tough on De Bruyn, especially since it was the batting and fielding that was perhaps more of a concern than the bowling, although that wasn't the greatest either, and Rabada missing does affect the bowling. Cricinfo is reporting that Du Plessis has said that going with four seamers is a possibility, but you never know with comments like that whether they're genuinely considering it or it was just a response to that point being raised as a question.I see your logic, and it could theoretically happen if they are worried about meeting the quota. But de Bruyn hasn't done anything droppable yet so he would feel hard done by.
1. Elgar
2. Kuhn
3. Amla
4. Faf
5. de Kock
6. Bavuma
7. Morris
8. Philander
9. Phelukwayo
10. Keshav
11. Morkel
It doesn't seem like a big downgrade because JP hasn't been a consistent source of runs. I'd still like de Bruyn in there but I don't see us going in with four POCs.
One thing that I did note from the commentary during the match was that apparently someone from the South African coaching staff had said that De Kock's ideal spot would be six, which would mean either mean playing a specialist batsman at seven or bringing in an all-rounder. So I do wonder whether the latter might be the thinking going forward, and Duminy would then be the most likely to give way. It does make the quota situation more complicated, but since most series these days seem to contain as many T20s as tests, they can potentially make up the numbers there if necessary.
Last edited: