Sky commentary eh?
I mean I really like Athers, Nasser, Holding don't mind Lloyd, Gower yet we can't escape that it's just an awful thing that Botham and Warne are getting worse if anything.
The way now that the good comms actually just troll them is just getting boring in itself, I get that they have to sit with the ignoramuses and it probably makes them feel better to take the piss, without the morons even getting it, but I find it just as dull as them going on about their nonsense.
I mean classic was Atherton trolling Warne by saying Stokes was the third best bat in the England side, presumably hoping Warne would say he was 2nd, as the Cook hate is palpable. This before tea on the first day. Yet Warne didn't bite, butt they went to the studio and Beefy had obviously been listening and jumped in that Stokes was clearly he second best.
I thought it ridiculous, but I thought maybe I'm being a bit Cook biased. Looked up the stats over a year, Cook though not in his best form comfortably ahead, thought well that doesn't include the 258, so checked 2 years, Cook even further ahead, then you get the small matter of over-all career records, ya know many 1000s of runs more at a hugely greater average. Actually did the same 1 and 2 year thing with Bairstow and Moeen and compared to Stokes they're both beating him over 1, 2 and career average thing too. So even Athers saying he's 3rd best is a bit dubious.
Now if you want to call him the second best cricketer, or the most destructive, I'll go with you, even though I think Broad should be there, but nah on the batsman alone.